Mark Warner (D-VA)
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Consumer Financial Protection Circular 2024-04: Whistleblower Protections Under CFPA Section 1057".
A Democratic resolution with no cosponsors
Last activity — Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S2272)
Introduced, nothing more yet
Formally proposed, and not yet handed to a committee.
Nearly every bill is sent to a committee within days. Introduction alone is not a sign of support, of momentum, or of any likelihood of passing — any member may introduce any bill.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
What this bill would do
This joint resolution seeks to express congressional disapproval of a rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. The rule in question involves the withdrawal of a previous rule regarding "Consumer Financial Protection Circular 2024-04: Whistleblower Protections Under CFPA Section 1057." If passed, the resolution dictates that the Bureau's rule shall have no force or effect.
Yes
No question was scored yes.
The opposite· 3 of 5
- Scored -5
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?
The resolution nullifies a circular meant to bolster whistleblower protections, which may reduce consumer financial protections against unfair practices.
- Scored -4
Would union members be better off under this?
The withdrawal of whistleblower protection guidelines can weaken the ability of employees to report financial irregularities safely.
- Scored -3
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
Weakening whistleblower protections for financial issues can negatively impact low-income consumers who rely on regulatory oversight.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
The provided text does not list specific positive impacts or benefits for individuals or groups of people.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
The provided text does not list specific negative impacts or burdens for individuals or groups of people.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would union members be better off under this? — The withdrawal of whistleblower protection guidelines can weaken the ability of employees to report financial irregularities safely. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Weakening whistleblower protections for financial issues can negatively impact low-income consumers who rely on regulatory oversight. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — The reduction of whistleblower protections for consumer financial issues may negatively impact middle-class financial security.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices? — The resolution nullifies a circular meant to bolster whistleblower protections, which may reduce consumer financial protections against unfair practices.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — By overturning a rule regarding whistleblower protections, the resolution may reduce transparency regarding financial misconduct.
- 5/13/2026
- Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S2272)
- 4/27/2026
- Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c).
- Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 391.
- 3/19/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.