Al Green (D-TX)
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Consumer Financial Protection Circular 2024-04: Whistleblower Protections Under CFPA Section 1057".
A Democratic resolution with no cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This joint resolution seeks to express congressional disapproval of a specific rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. The rule in question involves the withdrawal of a previous rule regarding "Consumer Financial Protection Circular 2024-04: Whistleblower Protections Under CFPA Section 1057". If this resolution passes, the rule submitted by the Bureau shall have no force or effect.
Yes
No question was scored yes.
The opposite· 3 of 4
- Scored -5
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?
The resolution blocks the disapproval of a rule that would have withdrawn whistleblower protections, effectively undermining consumer protection oversight.
- Scored -4
Would union members be better off under this?
The resolution targets a rule regarding whistleblower protections, which are essential tools for workers to report financial wrongdoing.
- Scored -3
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
Reducing whistleblower protections for consumer financial issues can negatively impact low-income households' ability to report misconduct.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- There are no specific positive impacts for people explicitly listed in the text provided.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- There are no specific negative impacts for people explicitly listed in the text provided.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would union members be better off under this? — The resolution targets a rule regarding whistleblower protections, which are essential tools for workers to report financial wrongdoing. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Reducing whistleblower protections for consumer financial issues can negatively impact low-income households' ability to report misconduct.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices? — The resolution blocks the disapproval of a rule that would have withdrawn whistleblower protections, effectively undermining consumer protection oversight.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — By disapproving the Bureau's rule withdrawal, the resolution maintains a specific administrative stance against the agency's recent regulatory movements.
- 4/30/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.