Rick Scott (R-FL)
A concurrent resolution denouncing the horrors of socialism.
A Republican resolution with no cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S6011-6012)
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
A concurrent resolution is how the Senate and the House settle something they do together, such as a budget plan or a joint session. It is adopted once both chambers agree to it, and that puts it into effect; it is not a law, so it does not go to the President.
What this bill would do
S. Con. Res. 21 is a concurrent resolution that denounces socialism in all its forms. The text argues that socialist ideology leads to concentrated power, totalitarian rule, and brutal dictatorships. It cites historical examples of famine, mass murder, and economic failure associated with socialist regimes. The resolution concludes by opposing the implementation of socialist policies within the United States.
Yes· 3 of 6
- Scored +5
Would high-income households be better off under this?
The resolution opposes policies that would redistribute wealth from those with higher industry and skill.
- Scored +5
Would business owners be better off under this?
The text emphasizes the security of property and opposes the expropriation of businesses.
- Scored +5
Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this?
The resolution protects against the seizure of assets associated with socialist policies.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Opposition to socialist policies: The resolution states that Congress opposes the implementation of socialist policies in the United States, which aligns with the mentioned beliefs in the sanctity of the individual and the security of property.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- The provided text does not list specific provisions that would create negative consequences or burdens for individuals.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would billionaires be better off under this? — The resolution explicitly opposes taking from those who have acquired much to give to others. Would business owners be better off under this? — The text emphasizes the security of property and opposes the expropriation of businesses. Would farmers be better off under this? — The resolution denounces the expropriation of land from farmers. Would high-income households be better off under this? — The resolution opposes policies that would redistribute wealth from those with higher industry and skill. Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this? — The resolution protects against the seizure of assets associated with socialist policies. Would the very wealthiest people be better off under this? — The resolution protects the fruits of individual industry and property rights.
- 9/3/2025
- Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S6011-6012)
- Introduced in Senate
2 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.