A Republican bill with 7 Democratic cosponsors · See all 13 cosponsors
Last activity — Held at the desk.
Passed one chamber, waiting for the other to take it up
Passed one chamber, and the other has not yet sent it to a committee or put it on its calendar.
The other chamber will hand it to a committee, place it on its calendar, or leave it where it is. Nothing has been decided, and a bill can sit here indefinitely.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- Passed Senate unanimous consent
- Awaiting House
The Senate by unanimous consent (no one objected, so there was no vote): no senator's position on it was recorded.
What this bill would do
This Act, known as "Tyler's Law," directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services to conduct a comprehensive study regarding fentanyl testing in hospital emergency departments. The study aims to examine testing frequency, costs, potential benefits and risks, staff training needs, and impacts on patient privacy and the patient-health care professional relationship. Additionally, the study will look into barriers faced by emergency departments when implementing such testing. Following the study, the Secretary must issue guidance on whether fentanyl testing should be a routine procedure for patients experiencing an overdose. This guidance will also cover how hospitals can inform professionals about tested substances, the impact of testing on future health outcomes, and available Federal resources.
Yes· 3 of 7
- Scored +6
Does this do more about addiction and overdose deaths?
By investigating routine fentanyl testing, the bill aims to better manage and respond to overdose incidents.
- Scored +5
Does this make health care easier to get in general?
The bill's focus on fentanyl testing could improve emergency care outcomes for overdose patients.
- Scored +3
Does this put more money into medical research?
The bill mandates a specific study into the efficacy and impact of fentanyl testing in emergency settings.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Information for Healthcare Providers: The guidance may help hospitals ensure health care professionals know exactly which substances are being tested for in routine drug tests (Section 2(b)(2)).
-
Improved Health Outcomes: The study and subsequent guidance will examine how testing for fentanyl or fentanyl-suced substances may affect the future risk of overdose and overall health outcomes (Section 2(b)(3)).
-
Financial and Operational Support: The Secretary will provide guidance on available Federal resources that can assist hospital emergency departments in implementing this testing (Section 2(b)(4)).
-
Addressing Implementation Barriers: The study aims to identify barriers that hospital emergency departments face and provide recommendations on how to address them (Section 2(a)(7)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Privacy and Security Risks: The bill notes that testing may impact the protection of a patient's protected health information (Section 2(a)(6)(A)).
-
Impact on Patient Relationships: The study must investigate how testing for fentanyl or related substances may impact the relationship between the patient and the health care professional (Section 2(a)(6)(B)).
-
Costs to the Healthcare System: The study is required to investigate the costs associated with testing for fentanyl or fentanyl-related substances (Section 2(a)(3)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Healthcare
- Does this do more about addiction and overdose deaths? — By investigating routine fentanyl testing, the bill aims to better manage and respond to overdose incidents. Does this make health care easier to get in general? — The bill's focus on fentanyl testing could improve emergency care outcomes for overdose patients. Does this put more money into medical research? — The bill mandates a specific study into the efficacy and impact of fentanyl testing in emergency settings.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The study aims to provide transparency regarding how hospitals currently handle fentanyl testing. Does this protect people from being watched or searched? — The bill includes a component to ensure patient privacy and security of health information is considered. Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill increases federal oversight by requiring the Secretary of HHS to study and issue guidance to hospitals.
- Education And Technology
- Does this give people more control over their personal data? — The bill explicitly directs the study to look at the impact on the privacy of protected health information.
- 3/24/2026
- Message on Senate action sent to the House.
- Held at the desk.
- Received in the House.
- 3/23/2026
- Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.
- Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1559-1560; text: CR S1559-1560)
- 2/11/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/28/2026
- Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Reported by Senator Cassidy with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.
- Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 307.
- 1/15/2026
- Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 1/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/11/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/29/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/11/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/8/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/10/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Maria CantwellDemocrat · Washington
Chuck GrassleyRepublican · Iowa
Maggie HassanDemocrat · New Hampshire
Amy KlobucharDemocrat · Minnesota
Andy KimDemocrat · New Jersey
Markwayne MullinRepublican · Oklahoma
Ashley MoodyRepublican · Florida
Alex PadillaDemocrat · California
Rick ScottRepublican · Florida
Tommy TubervilleRepublican · Alabama
Raphael WarnockDemocrat · Georgia
Mark WarnerDemocrat · Virginia
Todd YoungRepublican · Indiana