Mike Lee (R-UT)

Modernizing Retrospective Regulatory Review Act

S. 644 · Senate bill Government Operations and Politics

A Republican bill with 1 Republican cosponsor · See the cosponsor

Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

In committee

Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.

The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.

Its path through Congress

  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

What this bill would do

The "Modernizing Retrospective Regulatory Review Act" aims to improve how Federal regulations are reviewed after they are issued. The Act requires the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to report on how agency regulations are being made available in a machine-readable format. It also directs the issuance of guidance on using technology, such as artificial intelligence, to conduct these reviews more efficiently and accurately. Agencies will be required to create a detailed plan for implementing this guidance and reviewing their regulations. Finally, agencies must implement their respective strategies following the submission of these plans.

Yes· 3 of 5

  • Scored +5

    Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?

    The bill requires a report on making agency regulations available in a machine-readable format to improve public access and clarity.

  • Scored +3

    Does this reduce what the federal government spends?

    The bill encourages agencies to use technology to identify and remove obsolete, ineffective, or excessively burdensome regulations, which can reduce administrative costs.

  • Scored +3

    Does this make it easier to run a small business?

    The bill aims to identify and eliminate regulations that are excessively burdensome, which can reduce the regulatory burden on small businesses.

The opposite

No question was scored the opposite.