A Republican bill with 1 Republican cosponsor · See the cosponsor
Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is called the ``Protecting Florida's Offshore Military Readiness Act''. It was introduced in the Senate by Mr. Scott of Florida for himself and Mrs. Moody. The bill stops new oil and gas leasing, preleasing, production, and related activities in a specific area. That area is the Eglin Gulf Test and Training Range. The stop is called a moratorium and starts on the date of enactment. Valid existing leases that are already in effect when the bill is enacted will not be affected. The moratorium ends when the Secretary of War submits a certification to Congress saying the range is not of critical use.
Yes· 3 of 4
- Scored +6
Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests?
The legislation prioritizes military and national security needs over energy development by safeguarding the Eglin Gulf Test and Training Range.
- Scored +5
Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive?
The bill protects military readiness and operations in the Eglin Gulf Test and Training Range by halting new oil and gas activities.
- Scored +5
Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?
By protecting military training ranges from commercial disruption, the bill supports overall defense readiness beneficial to veterans.
The opposite· 3 of 5
- Scored -4
Does this reduce how much oil, gas and coal is produced?
The bill prohibits new oil and gas leasing, preleasing, and production activities within the specified test and training range.
- Scored -4
Would business owners be better off under this?
The bill prevents oil and gas companies and developers from pursuing new leasing and production projects within the Eglin Gulf Test and Training Range.
- Scored -2
Is this likely to lower the price at the pump?
Halting new oil and gas production areas in the Gulf could potentially exert slight upward pressure on future fuel supplies and prices.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Protection of Military Readiness: Section 2 adds a new subsection to the Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act of 2006. Subsection (d)(1) stops the Secretary from offering areas in the Eglin Gulf Test and Training Range for oil and gas leasing, preleasing, production, or related activities. This could be positive because it keeps oil and gas operations out of a designated testing and training range.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Limitations on New Oil and Gas Development: Section 2 adds subsection (d)(1), which puts a halt on new oil and gas leasing, preleasing, production, and related activities in the Eglin Gulf Test and Training Range. This could be viewed as a negative outcome or burden by individuals or groups looking to start new oil and gas development projects in that specific range.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive? — The bill protects military readiness and operations in the Eglin Gulf Test and Training Range by halting new oil and gas activities.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests? — The legislation prioritizes military and national security needs over energy development by safeguarding the Eglin Gulf Test and Training Range. Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? — Establishing a moratorium on oil and gas leasing and production in the Eglin Gulf Test and Training Range limits potential environmental risks from new fossil fuel extraction. Does this reduce how much oil, gas and coal is produced? — The bill prohibits new oil and gas leasing, preleasing, and production activities within the specified test and training range. Does this invest in rural communities? — Limits economic development opportunities tied to new offshore energy projects in coastal and adjacent regions. Is this likely to lower the price at the pump? — Halting new oil and gas production areas in the Gulf could potentially exert slight upward pressure on future fuel supplies and prices.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together? — By protecting military training ranges from commercial disruption, the bill supports overall defense readiness beneficial to veterans. Would business owners be better off under this? — The bill prevents oil and gas companies and developers from pursuing new leasing and production projects within the Eglin Gulf Test and Training Range. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — Restricting new energy development activities may limit local economic growth opportunities in some coastal and rural-adjacent areas.
- 9/30/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Ashley MoodyRepublican · Florida