Jim Banks (R-IN)

Electric Grid Supply Chain Security Act

S. 5590 · Senate bill Armed Forces and National Security

A Republican bill with no cosponsors

Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.

In committee

Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.

The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.

Its path through Congress

  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

What this bill would do

This bill is called the Electric Grid Supply Chain Security Act. It requires the Secretary of Defense to submit a plan to identify, prioritize, and fix the presence of certain equipment and computational facilities owned or controlled by a foreign adversary in the United States electric grid. The plan must assess risks to national defense, create criteria for prioritizing fixes, and include a remediation strategy coordinated with relevant State governments. The Secretary must submit this plan within 180 days of the bill's enactment to the congressional defense committees. Additionally, the Commander of the United States Northern Command must submit annual budget estimates starting in the fiscal year 2028 budget cycle to execute the plan.

Yes· 3 of 6

  • Scored +7

    Does this better protect the country from computer attacks?

    The bill requires a comprehensive plan to identify and remediate foreign adversary equipment and computational facilities in the U.S. electric grid, enhancing defense cybersecurity and critical infrastructure protection.

  • Scored +5

    Does this give the federal government more power?

    The legislation directs the Secretary of Defense and United States Northern Command to oversee a national plan identifying and remediating foreign adversary components in the domestic electric grid.

  • Scored +4

    Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive?

    The bill assesses and mitigates risks to military installations and critical electric infrastructure, indirectly supporting the security and stability of facilities utilized by veterans and active military personnel.

The opposite

No question was scored the opposite.