Jerry Moran (R-KS)
Fair Audits and Inspections for Regulators' Exams Act
A Republican bill with 3 Republican cosponsors · See all 3 cosponsors
Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "Fair Audits and Inspections for Regulators' Exams Act," aims to amend the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council Act of 1978. It establishes specific timelines for regulatory agencies to complete financial examinations and deliver final reports. The legislation also creates the Office of Independent Examination Review, featuring a three-member Board to oversee examination practices. This Office is tasked with investigating complaints and conducting quality assurance on examination procedures. Additionally, the bill establishes procedures for financial institutions to obtain written, binding advice from regulatory agencies. Finally, it provides institutions the right to an independent review of material supervisory determinations.
Yes
- Scored +7
Would business owners be better off under this?
Financial institutions benefit from increased predictability, binding advice, and independent review processes.
- Scored +6
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?
The bill strengthens due process for financial institutions by providing rights to independent reviews and hearings.
- Scored +5
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The bill increases transparency by requiring specific timelines for examinations and reports.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Predictable Timelines for Examinations: Regulatory agencies must complete examinations within 270 days and provide final reports within 90 days after an exit interview or receiving additional information (Section 1012(a) and (b)). This provides clarity for financial institutions regarding when an examination will conclude.
-
Mandatory Exit Interviews: Agencies are required to conduct an exit interview with senior management or the board of directors within 30 days of completing an examination (Section 1012(c)). This ensures leadership is informed of findings in a timely manner.
-
Access to Supporting Information: Financial institutions can request an appendix that lists all factual information the agency relied upon to support a material supervisory determination (Section 1012(d)).
-
Binding Regulatory Advice: Institutions can obtain written advice regarding specific actions, such as entering transactions or interpreting regulations, which is binding on the agency (Section �1013(a) and (f)). This allows institutions to move forward with confidence based on official guidance.
-
Independent Oversight and Complaint Resolution: The creation of the Office of Independent Examination Review provides a way for institutions to have complaints investigated and for examination procedures to be reviewed for consistency (Section 1014(d)).
-
Right to Independent Review: Institutions have the right to an independent review of material supervisory determinations, which can include a hearing to present evidence and testimony (Section 1015(a) and (c)).
-
Protection Against Retaliation: The bill explicitly prohibits regulatory agencies from retaliating against a financial institution for exercising its right to an independent review (Section 1015(g)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Potential for Delayed Timelines: Regulatory agencies may extend the period for completing an examination by providing written notice (Section 1012(a)), and the 90-day window for final reports begins only after an exit interview or the provision of additional info (Section 1012(b)).
-
Costs to Regulatory Agencies and Institutions: The Office of Independent Examination Review will require funding, with one-fifth of the costs and expenses to be paid by each Federal financial institutions regulatory agency (Section 1014(c)(2)(A)). Additionally, regulatory agencies may collect reasonable fees for processing written advice (Section 1013(i)).
-
Limited Scope of Binding Advice: Written advice provided by an agency is only binding regarding the specific facts described in the request and cannot be used as a precedent for other institutions (Section 1013(f)).
-
Complexity of the Review Process: Seeking an independent review requires specific notice within 30 days of receiving a final report (Section 1015(b)(1)), and the process involves specific requirements for providing facts, arguments, and documentation.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts? — The bill strengthens due process for financial institutions by providing rights to independent reviews and hearings. Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill increases transparency by requiring specific timelines for examinations and reports.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — Financial institutions benefit from increased predictability, binding advice, and independent review processes.
- 11/9/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/7/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/6/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in Senate
Kevin CramerRepublican · North Dakota
Steve DainesRepublican · Montana
Bill HagertyRepublican · Tennessee