Adam Schiff (D-CA)
Promoting Authenticity with Influencer Disclaimers Act
A Democratic bill with no cosponsors
Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The "Promoting Authenticity with Influencer Disclaimers Act" aims to amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971. This bill requires political committees to include specific disclaimers when paying individuals to post content on websites or digital applications. These disclaimers must be clear, conspicuous, and easily legible or audible. Additionally, the committee must notify the person receiving the payment of this requirement at the time the disbursement is made. The law would apply to communications made on or after January 1, 2027.
Yes
- Scored +7
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The bill increases transparency by requiring political committees to disclose when content is paid for via conspicuous disclaimers.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Transparency: By requiring a statement that a communication was paid for by a political committee, the bill ensures that content posted on digital platforms is identified as paid content (Section 2(a)(1)).
-
Clarity for Audiovisual and Text Content: The bill mandates that for audiovisual, text, or graphic communications, the disclaimer must be readily legible to an average viewer (Section 2(a)(2)(A)).
-
Clarity for Audio Content: For audio-only communications, the requirement that the statement be spoken in a clearly audible and intelligible manner ensures the message is understood (Section 2(a)(2)(B)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Compliance Burdens for Political Committees: Political committees are required to notify the person receiving a disbursement of the disclaimer requirement at the time the money is paid (Section 2(a)(3)).
-
Regulatory Uncertainty: While the Commission is tasked with creating regulations by January 1, 2027, the amendments themselves take effect on that same date regardless of whether those regulations have been finalized (Section 2(a)(5) and Section 2(b)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill increases transparency by requiring political committees to disclose when content is paid for via conspicuous disclaimers.
- 7/27/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.