A Democratic bill with 13 Democratic cosponsors · See all 13 cosponsors
Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The SAFER Health Act of 2026 aims to ensure the privacy of pregnancy termination or loss information. It prohibits covered entities and their business associates from disclosing this specific information in various legal or administrative proceedings without valid individual authorization. The bill includes exceptions for professional liability defense and investigations of physical harm when an individual is unable to consent. Additionally, it directs the Secretary to update regulations regarding information blocking and data segregation for health IT developers. The Act also establishes preemption rules to ensure consistent privacy protections across states.
Yes· 3 of 6
- Scored +9
Does this protect people from being watched or searched?
The bill significantly expands privacy protections for sensitive medical information related to pregnancy termination or loss.
- Scored +8
Would women be better off under this?
The bill provides critical privacy safeguards for sensitive reproductive health information specific to pregnancy.
- Scored +8
Does this give people more control over their personal data?
The bill mandates data segregation for pregnancy termination or loss information to ensure higher standards of privacy.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Privacy Protection: Under Section 2(a)(1), a covered entity or business associate is prohibited from disclosing an individual's pregnancy termination or loss information in Federal, State, local, or Tribal proceedings without valid authorization. This protects sensitive information from being shared in civil, criminal, administrative, or legislative proceedings.
-
Data Security through Segregation: According to Section 2(b)(2), the Secretary will require health IT developers to implement practices that allow for the segregation of data relating to pregnancy termination or loss information. This helps ensure compliance with the new privacy requirements.
-
Protection Against Information Blocking Charges: Per Section 2(b)(1), the Secretary will clarify that an entity's practice of not fulfilling a request to access or exchange electronic health information to comply with this Act will not be considered information blocking.
-
Uniformity of Protections: Under Section 2(c)(1), the Act preempts any State law that conflicts with or prevents the application of these privacy protections, ensuring a baseline of privacy regardless of location, while still allowing states to provide even greater protections.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Limitations on Information Disclosure for Investigations: According to Section 2(a)(2)(B), the exception to the privacy prohibition for investigating physical harm only applies if the individual is unable to provide consent due to death or incapacity.
-
Restrictions on Professional Liability Defense: Under Section 2(a)(2)(A), the ability to disclose information for defending a professional liability action is limited to specific disclosures made to an attorney, professional liability insurer, or an authorized attorney in a court or body hearing the action.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this protect people from being watched or searched? — The bill significantly expands privacy protections for sensitive medical information related to pregnancy termination or loss. Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill establishes federal preemption over state laws that conflict with these new privacy protections.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would women be better off under this? — The bill provides critical privacy safeguards for sensitive reproductive health information specific to pregnancy.
- Education And Technology
- Does this give people more control over their personal data? — The bill mandates data segregation for pregnancy termination or loss information to ensure higher standards of privacy.
- Healthcare
- Does this make health care easier to get in general? — The bill enhances privacy for sensitive reproductive health information, which can facilitate easier access to care without fear of disclosure.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated? — By protecting sensitive pregnancy-related data, the bill protects women's privacy and reproductive autonomy.
- 6/24/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
- 13 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
2 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Michael BennetDemocrat · Colorado
Cory BookerDemocrat · New Jersey
Catherine Cortez MastoDemocrat · Nevada
Tammy DuckworthDemocrat · Illinois
John HickenlooperDemocrat · Colorado
Martin HeinrichDemocrat · New Mexico
Edward MarkeyDemocrat · Massachusetts
Patty MurrayDemocrat · Washington
Adam SchiffDemocrat · California
Ron WydenDemocrat · Oregon
Sheldon WhitehouseDemocrat · Rhode Island
Mark WarnerDemocrat · Virginia
Elizabeth WarrenDemocrat · Massachusetts