A Republican bill with no cosponsors
Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The Monitor Accountability Act establishes specific conditions for when a district court appoints a monitor to oversee a State or local government. It directs the Judicial Conference of the United States to create rules regarding these appointments within 180 days. These rules include limits on monitor fees, terms of service, and restrictions on serving multiple monitorships. The bill also requires public notice and comment periods before a monitor is appointed. Additionally, it mandates annual accountings of services and fees to be made public.
Yes
- Scored +7
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The bill mandates public notice of appointments and the publication of annual service and fee accountings.
- Scored +3
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?
The bill increases transparency and limits fees for court-appointed monitors of government entities.
- Scored +2
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
By capping monitor fees and encouraging pro bono work, the bill may reduce the fiscal burden of oversight on public funds.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Fee Limitations: Monitors are prohibited from charging more than the maximum rates set by the Judicial Conference, and they are encouraged to use pro bono or reduced rates (Section 2(c)(1)). This could help control costs associated with monitorships.
-
Term Limits: A monitor cannot serve for a term longer than 5 years and cannot be reappointed under the same court order once that term ends (Section 2(c)(2)). This places a cap on the duration of a single person's control over a government entity.
-
Public Transparency and Input: The court must notify the public about a person being appointed and allow for public comment (Section 2(c)(4)). Furthermore, the court must make the monitor's annual accounting of services and fees available to the public (Section 2(e)(2)).
-
Conflict of Interest Protections: To prevent certain types of employment connections, a new monitor cannot be employed by the same employer as the previous monitor under the same court order (Section 2(c)(3)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Restrictions on Reappointment: Because a monitor cannot be reappointed after their 5-year term expires under the same court order, this could disrupt ongoing oversight (Section 2(c)(2)).
-
Mandatory Case Transfers: If a monitorship lasts longer than 6 years, the case must be transferred to a different judge, which may impact the continuity of the legal proceedings (Section 2(d)).
-
Strict Rules for Revision: A court can only revise a monitorship if the subject has not yet reached "substantial and sustained compliance," which limits how a monitorship can be changed (Section 2(c)(5)(B)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill mandates public notice of appointments and the publication of annual service and fee accountings.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices? — The bill increases transparency and limits fees for court-appointed monitors of government entities.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — By capping monitor fees and encouraging pro bono work, the bill may reduce the fiscal burden of oversight on public funds.
- 6/24/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- Introduced in Senate