Elizabeth Warren (D-MA)
Protecting American Consumers Act
A Democratic bill with 16 Democratic cosponsors · See all 16 cosponsors
Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is known as the Protecting American Consumers Act. It changes how the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection gets its money. Specifically, the bill amends the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010. It sets a mandatory funding floor for the Bureau. Under this new rule, the amount transferred to the Bureau each fiscal year cannot be less than 12 percent of the total operating expenses of the Federal Reserve System from its 2009 Annual Report.
Yes· 3 of 9
- Scored +6
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?
The bill establishes a mandatory funding floor for the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, ensuring sustained resources for consumer protection oversight.
- Scored +4
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
Low-income households benefit significantly from financial protection services guarding against predatory lending.
- Scored +3
Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this?
Young adults benefit from strengthened consumer financial protection oversight regarding credit and loans.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Guaranteed funding for consumer protection: Section 2 of the bill ensures that the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection receives a set funding floor of not less than 12 percent of the total operating expenses of the Federal Reserve System from its 2009 Annual Report. This is positive because it provides a reliable and steady source of financial support for the Bureau, allowing it to continuously protect everyday people from unfair financial practices.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts identified: Based strictly on the provided text, there are no specific sections or provisions outlined that create negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Low-income households benefit significantly from financial protection services guarding against predatory lending. Would people in middle age be better off under this? — Middle-aged households benefit from stable consumer financial protection agency funding. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — Middle-class households benefit from secure oversight of consumer financial products. Would retired people be better off under this? — Retirees benefit from sustained regulatory enforcement protecting consumer financial interests. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — Seniors benefit from robust consumer protection enforcement against financial fraud and predatory practices. Would students be better off under this? — Students benefit from stronger regulatory oversight of student loans and financial services. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — Young adults benefit from strengthened consumer financial protection oversight regarding credit and loans.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices? — The bill establishes a mandatory funding floor for the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, ensuring sustained resources for consumer protection oversight.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — The legislation guarantees a funding floor for a federal regulatory agency, slightly reinforcing federal oversight capacity.
- 9/22/2026
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- 6/4/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
- 10 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
Angela AlsobrooksDemocrat · Maryland
Lisa Blunt RochesterDemocrat · Delaware
Catherine Cortez MastoDemocrat · Nevada
Richard DurbinDemocrat · Illinois
John FettermanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Kirsten GillibrandDemocrat · New York
Ruben GallegoDemocrat · Arizona
Amy KlobucharDemocrat · Minnesota
Andy KimDemocrat · New Jersey
John ReedDemocrat · Rhode Island
Charles SchumerDemocrat · New York
Tina SmithDemocrat · Minnesota
Chris Van HollenDemocrat · Maryland
Raphael WarnockDemocrat · Georgia
Peter WelchDemocrat · Vermont
Mark WarnerDemocrat · Virginia