Deb Fischer (R-NE)
A bill to exempt stinger-steered combinations from a requirement to include warning flags on projecting loads.
A Republican bill with 1 Democratic cosponsor · See the cosponsor
Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill proposes exempting specific vehicle combinations from a federal requirement. Specifically, it targets stinger-steered combinations that transport assembled highway vehicles. These vehicles would no longer need to include warning flags on projecting loads. The legislation instructs the Secretary of Transportation to revise the relevant federal regulation. This revision must happen as soon as practicable after the act is enacted. Furthermore, the Secretary must carry out this revision without going through a notice and comment period or any other formal rulemaking process.
Yes
- Scored +3
Would business owners be better off under this?
The legislation benefits commercial transport operators and business owners by eliminating an administrative burden.
- Scored +3
Does this make it easier to run a small business?
The bill provides regulatory relief to certain automobile transporters by exempting them from specific warning flag requirements.
- Scored +2
Does this make it easier to do business across state lines?
The bill streamlines federal regulations affecting interstate transportation of motor vehicles.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Exemption from Warning Flag Rules: Under Section 1(a), stinger-steered combinations transporting assembled highway vehicles are exempt from the requirement to include warning flags on projecting loads under title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations. This could benefit operators by removing a specific regulatory requirement for these loads.
-
Fast-Tracked Regulatory Changes: Under Section 1(b)(2), the Secretary of Transportation must carry out the required regulation revision without engaging in notice and comment or any other formal rulemaking process. This allows the administrative change to happen directly without the usual public comment delay.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- The provided text does not contain any specific sections or provisions that outline potential negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — The legislation benefits commercial transport operators and business owners by eliminating an administrative burden.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this make it easier to run a small business? — The bill provides regulatory relief to certain automobile transporters by exempting them from specific warning flag requirements.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make it easier to do business across state lines? — The bill streamlines federal regulations affecting interstate transportation of motor vehicles.
- 6/3/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Gary PetersDemocrat · Michigan