A Republican bill with 6 Republican cosponsors · See all 6 cosponsors
Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "Detention Authority Clarification Act," aims to amend title II of the Immigration and Nationality Act. It focuses on the inspection and detention of certain individuals. Specifically, it changes the language regarding those seeking admission to refer to them as "the applicant for admission." The primary purpose is to require mandatory detention for aliens who are physically present in the United States but have not been admitted.
Yes
- Scored +5
Does this tighten control of the border?
The bill increases border control by requiring mandatory detention for certain applicants for admission who are physically present in the country.
The opposite· 3 of 4
- Scored -8
Would immigrants be better off under this?
The bill imposes mandatory detention on individuals who have not yet been admitted to the United States.
- Scored -6
Does this make it easier for immigrants already here to become citizens?
Mandatory detention of applicants for admission creates significant legal and physical barriers to the immigration process.
- Scored -5
Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this?
The bill's mandatory detention requirements target populations that include a high proportion of Hispanic immigrants.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Mandatory Detention Requirements: The bill adds a new subparagraph (F) to Section 236(c)(1) that includes applicants for admission described in section 235(a)(1) under the mandatory detention rules. This change aims to require the detention of aliens who are physically present in the United States but have not been admitted (Section 2, subsection b).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Mandatory Detention: By amending Section 236(c)(1) to include those described in section 235(a)(1), the bill requires the mandatory detention of certain applicants for admission (Section 2, subsection b).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would immigrants be better off under this? — The bill imposes mandatory detention on individuals who have not yet been admitted to the United States. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — The bill's mandatory detention requirements target populations that include a high proportion of Hispanic immigrants. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The mandatory detention of unadmitted individuals often disproportionately affects low-income immigrant populations.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this tighten control of the border? — The bill increases border control by requiring mandatory detention for certain applicants for admission who are physically present in the country. Does this make it easier for immigrants already here to become citizens? — Mandatory detention of applicants for admission creates significant legal and physical barriers to the immigration process.
- 7/23/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/13/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/20/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
Marsha BlackburnRepublican · Tennessee
Jim BanksRepublican · Indiana
John CornynRepublican · Texas
Lindsey GrahamRepublican · South Carolina
- Darline Graham
Republican · South Carolina
Tim ScottRepublican · South Carolina