A Republican bill with no cosponsors
Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "No Federal Expansion Designation in West Texas Act" or the "No FED in West Texas Act," seeks to stop a specific land plan. It prohibits the Secretary of the Interior from finalizing or enforcing the Land Protection Plan for the Muleshoe National Wildlife Refuge. This plan was detailed in a document published by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service in February 2023. The bill aims to prevent the implementation of this plan or any substantially similar land protection plan.
Yes
- Scored +3
Would farmers be better off under this?
The bill prevents the finalization of a land protection plan that could restrict land use for agricultural interests in the region.
- Scored +3
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?
The bill prevents federal land protection measures that may restrict development or usage in rural West Texas.
- Scored +3
Does this invest in rural communities?
By halting the land protection plan, the bill prevents federal land restrictions that could impact local land use in West Texas.
The opposite
- Scored -7
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?
The bill prohibits the implementation of the Land Protection Plan for the Muleshoe National Wildlife Refuge.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Prevention of land protection implementation: The bill stops the Secretary of the Interior from finalizing, implementing, administering, or enforcing the Land Protection Plan for Muleshoe National Wildlife Refuge (Section 2). This could be considered positive for those who oppose the specific land protection measures outlined in the February 2023 document.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would farmers be better off under this? — The bill prevents the finalization of a land protection plan that could restrict land use for agricultural interests in the region. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — The bill prevents federal land protection measures that may restrict development or usage in rural West Texas.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this invest in rural communities? — By halting the land protection plan, the bill prevents federal land restrictions that could impact local land use in West Texas. Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? — The bill prohibits the implementation of the Land Protection Plan for the Muleshoe National Wildlife Refuge.
- 4/28/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.