Jodey Arrington (R-TX)
No FED in West Texas Act
A Republican bill with 1 Republican cosponsor · See the cosponsor
Last activity — Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 374.
Cleared committee, waiting for its first floor vote
A committee approved it and it is on the calendar of the chamber it started in.
This is further than most bills get, and still no promise of a vote: the calendar is a queue, and the majority leadership decides what is called. A bill can sit here until the Congress ends.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- On Calendar
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "No Federal Expansion Designation in West Texas Act," aims to stop specific federal actions. It specifically targets the Muleshoe National Wildlife Refuge. The legislation prohibits the Secretary of the Interior from finalizing or carrying out a specific Land Protection Plan. This plan was detailed in a document published by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service in February 2023.
Yes· 3 of 4
- Scored +3
Does this leave more decisions to the states?
The bill limits federal administrative authority over specific land protection actions in West Texas.
- Scored +2
Does this invest in rural communities?
Preventing federal land protection plans may allow for more local land use and development in West Texas.
- Scored +2
Would farmers be better off under this?
Limiting federal land protection plans may facilitate easier local land access for agricultural interests.
The opposite
- Scored -5
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?
The bill prevents the implementation of a Land Protection Plan for the Muleshoe National Wildlife Refuge.
- Scored -5
Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests?
The bill stops the Fish and Wildlife Service from executing its established management plan for the refuge.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
The provided text does not list any specific positive impacts or benefits for individuals or groups.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
The provided text does not list any specific negative impacts or burdens for individuals or groups.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this invest in rural communities? — Preventing federal land protection plans may allow for more local land use and development in West Texas. Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? — The bill prevents the implementation of a Land Protection Plan for the Muleshoe National Wildlife Refuge. Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests? — The bill stops the Fish and Wildlife Service from executing its established management plan for the refuge.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would farmers be better off under this? — Limiting federal land protection plans may facilitate easier local land access for agricultural interests. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — The bill limits federal oversight of land in the West Texas region, which often benefits local rural interests.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this leave more decisions to the states? — The bill limits federal administrative authority over specific land protection actions in West Texas.
- 1/8/2026
- Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 119-435.
- Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 374.
- 7/23/2025
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fisheries Discharged
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 23 - 16.
- 5/15/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/8/2025
- Subcommittee Hearings Held
- 4/1/2025
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fisheries.
- 1/31/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Wesley HuntRepublican · Texas