John Cornyn (R-TX)· Mar 19, 2026
S.Amdt. 4707: To amend the definition of Trusted Traveler Program.
Adopted
With no one objecting, no names recorded
John Cornyn (R-TX)
End Special Treatment for Congress at Airports Act of 2026
S. 4123 · Senate bill Transportation and Public Works
A Republican bill with no cosponsors
Last activity — Held at the desk.
Passed one chamber, waiting for the other to take it up
Passed one chamber, and the other has not yet sent it to a committee or put it on its calendar.
The other chamber will hand it to a committee, place it on its calendar, or leave it where it is. Nothing has been decided, and a bill can sit here indefinitely.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- Passed Senate unanimous consent
- Awaiting House
The Senate by unanimous consent (no one objected, so there was no vote): no senator's position on it was recorded.
What this bill would do
This bill is called the End Special Treatment for Congress at Airports Act of 2026. It stops the Transportation Security Administration from using funds to give Members of Congress expedited or preferential access through airport security screenings. Under the bill, elected officials cannot be exempt from standard passenger and baggage screening procedures based on their official position. The legislation ensures that Members of Congress must go through regular security just like everyone else. However, they are still allowed to participate in publicly available Trusted Traveler Programs like PreCheck if they qualify just like any other citizen. Finally, the Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration must update policies and report back to Congress on compliance within 180 days.
Yes· 3 of 4
- Scored +2
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The bill requires the TSA Administrator to submit a compliance report to Congress, increasing transparency regarding security policies.
- Scored +1
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
The bill ensures that political elites cannot bypass the same security procedures required of all citizens.
- Scored +1
Would people in cities be better off under this?
Ensures equality in the application of airport security standards for all travelers.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Section 3: This section stops elected officials from getting special treatment or expedited access at airport security just because of their jobs. People might see this as a positive way to hold our leaders accountable and ensure they follow the exact same rules as the everyday folks who voted for them.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Section 4: This section allows Members of Congress to still use public Trusted Traveler Programs like PreCheck as long as it is not based on their official position. If someone believes that elected officials should face harsher restrictions than the general public, this provision might be viewed as a negative loophole because it still lets them use expedited lanes that regular citizens also use.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The bill ensures that political elites cannot bypass the same security procedures required of all citizens. Would people in cities be better off under this? — Ensures equality in the application of airport security standards for all travelers.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill requires the TSA Administrator to submit a compliance report to Congress, increasing transparency regarding security policies.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — The bill promotes equality by ensuring all individuals are subject to the same security procedures regardless of official status.
- 3/24/2026
- Message on Senate action sent to the House.
- Held at the desk.
- Received in the House.
- 3/19/2026
- Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation discharged by Unanimous Consent.
- Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S1355-1356)
- Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.
- Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent. (text: CR S1356)
- 3/17/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.