Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV)
Expanding Access to Lending Options Act
A Democratic bill with 3 Republican cosponsors · See all 4 cosponsors
Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "Expanding Access to Lending Options Act," aims to provide the National Credit Union Administration Board with more flexibility. It specifically targets the ability to increase loan maturities for Federal credit unions. The legislation proposes amending the Federal Credit Union Act to allow for longer terms. This change would allow the Board to permit loans for terms of up to 20 years through regulations.
Yes· 3 of 6
- Scored +3
Does this make housing cost less?
By allowing longer loan maturities for principal residences, the bill may assist with long-term mortgage affordability.
- Scored +2
Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this?
Longer loan terms can provide more manageable monthly payments for younger borrowers establishing themselves.
- Scored +2
Would middle-income households be better off under this?
Increased flexibility in loan maturities can help middle-income families manage long-term debt like mortgages.
The opposite
- Scored -1
Does this leave more decisions to the states?
The bill increases the regulatory authority of the National Credit Union Administration Board over loan terms.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Increased Loan Terms: The bill allows the Board to increase loan maturities up to a term of 20 years, which could provide more flexible lending options for members (Section 2).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly mentioned in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — The bill provides more flexible lending options that can be utilized for business-related financing. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — Increased flexibility in loan maturities can help middle-income families manage long-term debt like mortgages. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — Longer loan terms can provide more manageable monthly payments for younger borrowers establishing themselves. Would people in cities be better off under this? — Increased lending flexibility may assist urban dwellers in accessing longer-term mortgage products.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this make housing cost less? — By allowing longer loan maturities for principal residences, the bill may assist with long-term mortgage affordability.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this make it easier to run a small business? — The bill expands the ability of credit unions to offer longer-term financing which can benefit small business owners seeking capital.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this leave more decisions to the states? — The bill increases the regulatory authority of the National Credit Union Administration Board over loan terms.
- 9/28/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/13/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in Senate
Kevin CramerRepublican · North Dakota
James JusticeRepublican · West Virginia
Pete RickettsRepublican · Nebraska
Mark WarnerDemocrat · Virginia