Cynthia Lummis (R-WY)
Grizzly Bear State Management Act of 2025
A Republican bill with 5 Republican cosponsors · See all 5 cosponsors
Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "Grizzly Bear State Management Act of 2025," directs the Secretary of the Interior to take specific action regarding grizzly bears. It requires the reissuance of a final rule intended to remove the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem population of grizzly bears from the Federal list of endangered and threatened wildlife. This action must occur within 180 days of the bill's enactment. The bill also specifies that the reissuance of this rule cannot be subject to judicial review.
Yes
- Scored +4
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?
Removing federal protections on grizzly bears may benefit local land management and activities in rural areas like the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem.
The opposite· 3 of 4
- Scored -6
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?
The provision prohibiting judicial review limits the legal recourse available to challenge agency actions.
- Scored -5
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?
The bill removes the federal endangered species protections for the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem population of grizzly bears.
- Scored -4
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The bill limits public accountability by prohibiting judicial review of the rule reissuance.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Removal of Protected Status: By directing the Secretary of the Interior to reissue the final rule that removes the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem population of grizzly bears from the Federal list of endangered and threatened wildlife, the bill changes the legal status of these animals (Section 2(a)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Limitation of Legal Oversight: The bill states that the reissuance of the final rule, including this specific section, shall not be subject to judicial review (Section 2(b)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts? — The provision prohibiting judicial review limits the legal recourse available to challenge agency actions. Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill limits public accountability by prohibiting judicial review of the rule reissuance. Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill directs a specific agency action while simultaneously stripping the judiciary's power to review that action.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? — The bill removes the federal endangered species protections for the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem population of grizzly bears.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — Removing federal protections on grizzly bears may benefit local land management and activities in rural areas like the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem.
- 1/29/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
- 5 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
John BarrassoRepublican · Wyoming
Mike CrapoRepublican · Idaho
Steve DainesRepublican · Montana
James RischRepublican · Idaho
Tim SheehyRepublican · Montana