John Curtis (R-UT)

POST Act of 2025

S. 3100 · Senate bill Government Operations and Politics

A Republican bill with 1 Democratic cosponsor · See all 2 cosponsors

Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

In committee

Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.

The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.

Its path through Congress

  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

What this bill would do

The POST Act of 2025 directs the Director of the Federal Protective Service to improve the oversight and accountability of contract security personnel. The bill requires the establishment of new processes for collecting and analyzing data from covert testing to improve security performance. It also mandates that security contractors implement corrective training for personnel who fail these tests. Additionally, the Director must evaluate and potentially modernize the personnel tracking system used to manage security deployment. The bill aims to ensure better communication with building tenants regarding security coverage gaps. Finally, it requires regular reports to Congress regarding these implementation efforts.

Yes· 3 of 6

  • Scored +3

    Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?

    The bill mandates regular reports to Congress regarding security oversight and the implementation of system modernization.

  • Scored +2

    Would people in cities be better off under this?

    The improved security and communication protocols benefit the tenants and those surrounding federal buildings, often located in urban centers.

  • Scored +1

    Does this give people more control over their personal data?

    The evaluation of the personnel tracking system includes a focus on implementing more reliable and potentially more secure digital platforms.

The opposite

No question was scored the opposite.