Roger Marshall (R-KS)
Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act of 2025
A Republican bill with 5 Democratic cosponsors · See all 16 cosponsors
Last activity — Became Public Law No: 119-69.
Became law
Passed both chambers and was signed by the President, or became law without a signature.
Nothing more in Congress: it is law. When it takes effect depends on the dates written into it — some parts start at once, others a year or more later.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- Passed Senate unanimous consent
- Passed House voice vote
- To President
- Became Law
No one's position on it was recorded: the Senate by unanimous consent (no one objected, so there was no vote), and the House by voice vote (members called out yes or no together).
What this bill would do
The "Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act of 2025" aims to amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act. This legislation allows schools participating in the school lunch program to offer whole milk, whether organic or non-organic. It also updates regulations regarding the nutritional standards for nondairy beverages and saturated fat measurements. Additionally, the bill expands the list of individuals who can authorize certain milk options. Finally, it incorporates food allergy information into existing training modules for local food service personnel.
Yes· 3 of 6
- Scored +5
Would children be better off under this?
The bill increases the variety of milk options available to students and enhances food allergy safety training for schools.
- Scored +5
Would students be better off under this?
Students benefit from expanded milk choices and improved food allergy safety protocols in their schools.
- Scored +3
Does this make health care easier to get in general?
The bill enhances nutritional standards and safety training regarding food allergies for school-aged children.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased milk options for students: Schools may now offer flavored and unflavored organic or nonorganic whole milk, as well as reduced-fat, low-fat, fat-free, and lactose-free options (Section 2, subsection a, clause 1).
-
Expanded authority for dietary needs: The bill allows parents or legal guardians, in addition to physicians, to assist in meeting student needs (Section 2, subsection a, clause 1, subparagraph B).
-
Improved safety via training: Food service personnel will receive training on food allergies, including how to prevent, recognize, and respond to allergic reactions (Section 3, subsection a).
-
Nutritional equivalence for non-dairy options: Nondairy beverages must be fortified with calcium, protein, vitamin A, and vitamin D to levels found in cow's milk (Section 2, subsection a, clause 1).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts are explicitly stated in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would children be better off under this? — The bill increases the variety of milk options available to students and enhances food allergy safety training for schools. Would students be better off under this? — Students benefit from expanded milk choices and improved food allergy safety protocols in their schools. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Expanding milk varieties within the national school lunch program can provide more nutritional diversity to low-income students.
- Healthcare
- Does this make health care easier to get in general? — The bill enhances nutritional standards and safety training regarding food allergies for school-aged children.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this make child care cost less? — By expanding milk options and nutritional standards, the bill supports the nutritional needs of children in school environments.
- Education And Technology
- Does this put more money into public schools? — The bill expands the nutritional variety and safety training available within the public school lunch program.
- Public Law (1/15/2026)
The text as it became law
- Enrolled Bill
The final version, on its way to the President
- 1/14/2026
- Signed by President.
- Became Public Law No: 119-69.
- 1/6/2026
- Presented to President.
- 12/15/2025
- Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.
- On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.
- DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on S. 222.
- Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H5857-5861)
- Mr. Thompson (PA) moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.
- 11/20/2025
- Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.
- Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S8259-8261; text: CR S8261)
- Message on Senate action sent to the House.
- Held at the desk.
- Received in the House.
- 7/10/2025
- Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry. Reported by Senator Boozman with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.
- Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 111.
- 6/5/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/3/2025
- Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
- 5/19/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/1/2025
- Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 119-55.
- 3/27/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/30/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 1/23/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
- 10 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Mike CrapoRepublican · Idaho
Susan CollinsRepublican · Maine
Joni ErnstRepublican · Iowa
Deb FischerRepublican · Nebraska
John FettermanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Chuck GrassleyRepublican · Iowa
Kirsten GillibrandDemocrat · New York
Martin HeinrichDemocrat · New Mexico
Cindy Hyde-SmithRepublican · Mississippi
James JusticeRepublican · West Virginia
Angus KingIndependent · Maine
Jerry MoranRepublican · Kansas
David McCormickRepublican · Pennsylvania
James RischRepublican · Idaho
Elissa SlotkinDemocrat · Michigan
Peter WelchDemocrat · Vermont