Jamie Raskin (D-MD)

Expressing support for the designation of May 4, 2025, as a "National Day of Reason" and recognizing the central importance of reason in the betterment of humanity.

H.Res. 376 · House resolution Government Operations and Politics

A Democratic resolution with 7 Democratic cosponsors · See all 7 cosponsors

Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

In committee

Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.

The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.

Its path through Congress

  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.

What this bill would do

This resolution expresses support for designating May 4, 2025, as a "National Day of Reason." It recognizes reason as a central requirement for the progress of humanity in scientific, medical, technological, and social fields. The text argues that reason is necessary to address current crises such as climate change, the rise of authoritarianism, and the defense of democratic institutions. It highlights the importance of protecting the separation of church and state to ensure a pluralistic democracy. Finally, the resolution encourages all persons in the United States to observe this day to promote critical thought and the scientific method.

Yes· 3 of 8

  • Scored +2

    Does this protect the individual right to speak freely?

    The text advocates for the protection of freedom of speech and inquiry as a core component of reason.

  • Scored +2

    Does this protect what people are allowed to say in public life?

    The resolution explicitly highlights the protection of freedom of thought, speech, and inquiry in civil society.

  • Scored +1

    Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?

    The emphasis on knowledge and truth-seeking serves to counter propaganda and disinformation in public life.

The opposite

No question was scored the opposite.