Daniel Meuser (R-PA)
Calling upon local communities to support organizations that provide resources and aid Gold Shield Families in their time of need.
A Republican resolution with 4 Democratic cosponsors · See all 17 cosponsors
Last activity — Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Adopted
The chamber formally agreed to it, and for a resolution that is the finish line: what it says is now officially the chamber's position, rule or tribute.
Nothing more is needed. A resolution is how a chamber speaks for itself or sets its own rules, so adopting it is what puts it into effect. It is not a law, so there is nothing for the President to sign.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- Adopted by the House voice vote
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
The House by voice vote (members called out yes or no together): no member's position on it was recorded.
What this bill would do
H. Res. 364 recognizes the courage of first responders and the sacrifices of their families. It specifically acknowledges Gold Shield Families, who are families of various emergency service providers lost in the line of duty. The resolution notes that nonprofits provide these families with resources and support. It resolves that local communities should support these nonprofits. Additionally, it resolves that Gold Shield Families should use these resources.
Yes· 3 of 7
- Scored +3
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
Encourages aid from nonprofits to assist families in financial hardship following a death.
- Scored +2
Would children be better off under this?
Provides support systems for children of fallen first responders.
- Scored +2
Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this?
Provides support systems for young adults of fallen first responders.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Support for Gold Shield Families: The resolution encourages local communities to support nonprofits that provide aid and resources to families of fallen first responders during times of grief and hardship. (Resolved section 1)
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts for individuals or groups are explicitly mentioned in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Encourages aid from nonprofits to assist families in financial hardship following a death. Would children be better off under this? — Provides support systems for children of fallen first responders. Would people in middle age be better off under this? — Provides support systems for spouses and parents of fallen first responders. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — Provides an additional layer of community support for families. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — Provides support systems for elderly parents of fallen first responders. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — Provides support systems for young adults of fallen first responders.
- Healthcare
- Does this make mental health care easier to get? — Encourages the use of nonprofit resources to help Gold Shield Families process grief and sacrifice.
- 5/13/2025
- Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H1960)
- On motion to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H1960)
- DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H. Res. 364.
- Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H1960-1961)
- Mr. Onder moved to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution.
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- 5/8/2025
- 5 Cosponsors added.
- 5/7/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/6/2025
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 4/30/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.
Don BaconRepublican · Nebraska
Robert BresnahanRepublican · Pennsylvania
Donald DavisDemocrat · North Carolina
Pat FallonRepublican · Texas
Jared GoldenDemocrat · Maine
J. HillRepublican · Arkansas
David KustoffRepublican · Tennessee
Anna Paulina LunaRepublican · Florida
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York
Nicole MalliotakisRepublican · New York
Tracey MannRepublican · Kansas
Tim MooreRepublican · North Carolina
Troy NehlsRepublican · Texas
Chris PappasDemocrat · New Hampshire
Nellie PouDemocrat · New Jersey
Glenn ThompsonRepublican · Pennsylvania
Claudia TenneyRepublican · New York