Nikema Williams (D-GA)
Expressing opposition to the use of State power against people in the United States seeking essential health care, including criminalization of the full range of sexual and reproductive health care such as abortion, gender-affirming care, and contraceptive care, and disapproving of State punishment of people for their pregnancy outcomes.
A Democratic resolution with 59 Democratic cosponsors · See all 59 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution expresses opposition to the use of State power to criminalize sexual and reproductive health care, including abortion, gender-affirming care, and contraception. It condemns the punishment of individuals for pregnancy outcomes, such as miscarriages or stillbirths, and the penalization of health care providers who offer these services. The text highlights how marginalized groups are disproportionately impacted by the criminal justice system regarding these issues. It aligns with major medical and human rights organizations in recommending the decriminalization of these health care services. Ultimately, the House of Representatives resolves to condemn such criminalization and affirms the commitment to work toward a future where patients can access this care without restrictions or fear of punishment.
Yes· 3 of 10
- Scored +8
Does this make health care easier to get in general?
The resolution expresses support for universal access to reproductive and gender-affirming health care free from state restrictions and bans.
- Scored +7
Would women be better off under this?
Women benefit from the resolution's strong stance against criminalizing pregnancy outcomes and restricting reproductive health care access.
- Scored +7
Would LGBTQ people be better off under this?
The resolution explicitly opposes the criminalization and restriction of gender-affirming care, benefiting the LGBTQ+ community.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Protection from State Punishment for Pregnancy Outcomes: The resolution condemns the application of criminal laws to punish people for the outcomes of their pregnancies, which protects individuals from facing criminal or civil charges for events like miscarriages or stillbirths. This is supported by the resolved clause (1).
-
Support for Universal Access to Health Care: The text declares a goal for a future where patients can access sexual and reproductive health care—including abortion, contraception, and gender-affirming care—free from restrictions, bans, and barriers. This is detailed in resolved clause (5)(A).
-
Affirmation of Provider Ethics and Patient Privacy: The resolution affirms the ethical obligations of health care providers to safeguard patient privacy and private medical information. This can be found in resolved clause (4).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- None Identified: The provided text does not contain any sections or provisions that outline negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would LGBTQ people be better off under this? — The resolution explicitly opposes the criminalization and restriction of gender-affirming care, benefiting the LGBTQ+ community. Would women be better off under this? — Women benefit from the resolution's strong stance against criminalizing pregnancy outcomes and restricting reproductive health care access. Would Black Americans be better off under this? — Black Americans experience disproportionate scrutiny and punishment regarding pregnancy outcomes, which this resolution explicitly condemns. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Low-income individuals, who are disproportionately impacted by criminal justice scrutiny regarding pregnancy outcomes, benefit from this protective stance. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — Young adults and youth seeking reproductive or gender-affirming care benefit from the resolution's condemnation of criminalization.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this expand the rights of LGBTQ people? — The resolution opposes the criminalization of gender-affirming care, supporting the rights and access of LGBTQ individuals. Does this shorten or soften prison sentences? — The resolution condemns the use of criminal laws and punishment against individuals for pregnancy outcomes and healthcare provision. Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — The text highlights and condemns how marginalized racial and ethnic groups are disproportionately targeted by criminal laws related to healthcare and pregnancy outcomes.
- Healthcare
- Does this make health care easier to get in general? — The resolution expresses support for universal access to reproductive and gender-affirming health care free from state restrictions and bans.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this protect people from being watched or searched? — The resolution affirms the ethical obligations of health care providers to safeguard private medical information and patient privacy.
- 11/12/2026
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 59 Cosponsors added.
Alma AdamsDemocrat · North Carolina
Suzanne BonamiciDemocrat · Oregon
Joyce BeattyDemocrat · Ohio
Julia BrownleyDemocrat · California
Nanette BarragánDemocrat · California
Becca BalintDemocrat · Vermont
Emanuel CleaverDemocrat · Missouri
André CarsonDemocrat · Indiana
Judy ChuDemocrat · California
Salud CarbajalDemocrat · California
Troy CarterDemocrat · Louisiana
Jasmine CrockettDemocrat · Texas
Lloyd DoggettDemocrat · Texas
Christopher DeluzioDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Suzan DelBeneDemocrat · Washington
Mark DeSaulnierDemocrat · California
Debbie DingellDemocrat · Michigan
Madeleine DeanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Dwight EvansDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Veronica EscobarDemocrat · Texas
Lois FrankelDemocrat · Florida
Lizzie FletcherDemocrat · Texas
Maxwell FrostDemocrat · Florida
Valerie FousheeDemocrat · North Carolina
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey
Sylvia GarciaDemocrat · Texas
Robert GarciaDemocrat · California
Jared HuffmanDemocrat · California
Pramila JayapalDemocrat · Washington
Sydney Kamlager-DoveDemocrat · California
Teresa Leger FernandezDemocrat · New Mexico
Summer LeeDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Doris MatsuiDemocrat · California
Seth MoultonDemocrat · Massachusetts
Joseph MorelleDemocrat · New York
Morgan McGarveyDemocrat · Kentucky
Seth MagazinerDemocrat · Rhode Island
Kevin MullinDemocrat · California
Jennifer McClellanDemocrat · Virginia
Dave MinDemocrat · California
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Mark PocanDemocrat · Wisconsin
Scott PetersDemocrat · California
Mike QuigleyDemocrat · Illinois
Deborah RossDemocrat · North Carolina
Delia RamirezDemocrat · Illinois
Adam SmithDemocrat · Washington
Bradley SchneiderDemocrat · Illinois
Melanie StansburyDemocrat · New Mexico
Hillary ScholtenDemocrat · Michigan
Mark TakanoDemocrat · California
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Lori TrahanDemocrat · Massachusetts
Ritchie TorresDemocrat · New York
Jill TokudaDemocrat · Hawaii
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan
Juan VargasDemocrat · California
Frederica WilsonDemocrat · Florida
Bonnie Watson ColemanDemocrat · New Jersey