Debbie Dingell (D-MI)
Recognizing and honoring the 27th anniversary of the Supreme Court decision in Olmstead v. L.C.
A Democratic resolution with 4 Republican cosponsors · See all 17 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
H. Res. 1586 recognizes and honors the 27th anniversary of the Supreme Court decision in Olmstead v. L.C. The resolution notes that over 70,000,000 adults with disabilities live in the United States. It affirms the importance of the Olmstead decision and the integration mandate under section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. The text highlights that unnecessary segregation of individuals with disabilities limits their opportunities. Finally, it calls on all levels of government to advance policies that allow individuals with disabilities to live and work in integrated community settings.
Yes· 3 of 4
- Scored +9
Would people with disabilities be better off under this?
The resolution recognizes the anniversary of Olmstead v. L.C. and calls for policies advancing community integration, independence, and employment for individuals with disabilities.
- Scored +8
Does this expand the rights of people with disabilities?
The resolution honors the anniversary of the Olmstead decision and reaffirms federal commitments to the integration mandate for individuals with disabilities.
- Scored +5
Does this make health care easier to get in general?
The resolution affirms support for expanding home- and community-based services and integrated settings for individuals with disabilities.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Paragraph (5) of the resolution calls on Federal, State, and local governments to advance policies that enable individuals with disabilities to live and work in integrated community settings and achieve greater independence. This could be considered positive because it promotes expanded access to competitive integrated employment, education, home- and community-based services, and other supports.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would people with disabilities be better off under this? — The resolution recognizes the anniversary of Olmstead v. L.C. and calls for policies advancing community integration, independence, and employment for individuals with disabilities.
- Healthcare
- Does this make health care easier to get in general? — The resolution affirms support for expanding home- and community-based services and integrated settings for individuals with disabilities. Does this put more money into Medicaid, the health coverage for people on low incomes? — The resolution highlights the critical role of Medicaid home- and community-based services in supporting individuals with disabilities.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this expand the rights of people with disabilities? — The resolution honors the anniversary of the Olmstead decision and reaffirms federal commitments to the integration mandate for individuals with disabilities.
- 11/11/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 10/29/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 10/26/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/15/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 10/9/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 10/1/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/28/2026
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 6 Cosponsors added.
Gabe AmoDemocrat · Rhode Island
Nikki BudzinskiDemocrat · Illinois
Becca BalintDemocrat · Vermont
Mark DeSaulnierDemocrat · California
Brian FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania
William KeatingDemocrat · Massachusetts
Thomas KeanRepublican · New Jersey
Ted LieuDemocrat · California
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York
Greg LandsmanDemocrat · Ohio
Gwen MooreDemocrat · Wisconsin
Janice SchakowskyDemocrat · Illinois
Mary Gay ScanlonDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Lateefah SimonDemocrat · California
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Eugene VindmanDemocrat · Virginia
Joe WilsonRepublican · South Carolina