Marc Veasey (D-TX)
Designating September 2026 as "National Voting Rights Month".
A Democratic resolution with 33 Democratic cosponsors · See all 33 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on House Administration, Oversight and Government Reform, and Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution officially designates September 2026 as National Voting Rights Month. It highlights historical and modern challenges to voting, such as voter suppression, gerrymandering, and recent Supreme Court decisions. The text encourages Congress to pass specific voting rights legislation while opposing other designated bills. Additionally, it recommends that schools develop curricula on voting history and current restrictions. Finally, the measure suggests funding public service announcements to remind citizens about elections and registration deadlines.
Yes· 3 of 15
- Scored +7
Would Black Americans be better off under this?
The resolution specifically advocates for protections against historical and current racial injustices in voting.
- Scored +7
Would Native Americans be better off under this?
The resolution notes the history of voter suppression against Native Americans and seeks to prevent future barriers.
- Scored +7
Does this protect the right to vote?
The resolution encourages passing the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act to strengthen and modernize protections for voters.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Educational Benefits: Public schools and universities are recommended to develop an academic curriculum that teaches students about voting importance, registration, and the history of voter suppression as outlined in Resolved paragraph (5). This could benefit students and future voters by increasing civic awareness and knowledge.
-
Informed Voters: Congress is invited to allocate funds for public service announcements across various media platforms to share registration deadlines and remind people when elections happen, according to Resolved paragraph (7). This provision helps ensure individuals stay informed and prepared to participate in elections.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
Based strictly on the provided text, there are no explicit sections or provisions identified that create negative outcomes, consequences, or burdens for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would Black Americans be better off under this? — The resolution specifically advocates for protections against historical and current racial injustices in voting. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — The resolution notes the history of voter suppression against Native Americans and seeks to prevent future barriers. Would Asian Americans be better off under this? — The resolution aims to safeguard the rights of underrepresented minority voters. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — The resolution highlights the need to protect underrepresented minority groups from vote dilution. Would students be better off under this? — The resolution recommends new educational curricula regarding the importance and mechanics of voting for students. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Protecting voting rights can help prevent the disenfranchisement of poor voters due to financial barriers. Would people with disabilities be better off under this? — The resolution notes that current restrictions could impact disabled voters and seeks to protect their access. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — Educational curricula on voting can empower younger generations to participate in democracy. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — The resolution aims to protect the voting rights of elderly populations who may face modern-day barriers. Would women be better off under this? — Enhanced voting access provides better representation for all citizens, including women.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this protect the right to vote? — The resolution encourages passing the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act to strengthen and modernize protections for voters. Does this make casting a ballot easier in practice? — The resolution promotes awareness of registration deadlines and election dates through proposed public service announcements. Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — Increased voter participation can lead to better representation for low-income individuals' needs.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make elections run better? — The resolution seeks to combat voter suppression through legislative advocacy and public education.
- Education And Technology
- Does this make it easier to use public money at a school other than the local one? — The resolution recommends that educational institutions develop curricula regarding the history and importance of voting.
- 10/5/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/15/2026
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on House Administration, Oversight and Government Reform, and Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 31 Cosponsors added.
2 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Alma AdamsDemocrat · North Carolina
Jim CostaDemocrat · California
Kathy CastorDemocrat · Florida
Yvette ClarkeDemocrat · New York
André CarsonDemocrat · Indiana
Judy ChuDemocrat · California
J. CorreaDemocrat · California
Angie CraigDemocrat · Minnesota
Lloyd DoggettDemocrat · Texas
Suzan DelBeneDemocrat · Washington
Debbie DingellDemocrat · Michigan
Sharice DavidsDemocrat · Kansas
Sarah ElfrethDemocrat · Maryland
Adelita GrijalvaDemocrat · Arizona
Steven HorsfordDemocrat · Nevada
Jonathan JacksonDemocrat · Illinois
Julie JohnsonDemocrat · Texas
Sydney Kamlager-DoveDemocrat · California
Rick LarsenDemocrat · Washington
James McGovernDemocrat · Massachusetts
Gwen MooreDemocrat · Wisconsin
Grace MengDemocrat · New York
Seth MoultonDemocrat · Massachusetts
Kevin MullinDemocrat · California
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Johnny OlszewskiDemocrat · Maryland
Brittany PettersenDemocrat · Colorado
Nellie PouDemocrat · New Jersey
Robert ScottDemocrat · Virginia
Hillary ScholtenDemocrat · Michigan
Lateefah SimonDemocrat · California
Paul TonkoDemocrat · New York
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan