Debbie Dingell (D-MI)
Expressing support for the designation of June 1, 2026, through June 7, 2026, as "Hidradenitis Suppurativa Awareness Week".
A Democratic resolution with 1 Republican cosponsor · See all 2 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution expresses support for designating June 1, 2026, through June 7, 2026, as Hidradenitis Suppurativa Awareness Week. It highlights that Hidradenitis Suppurativa is a chronic, inflammatory skin disease affecting about 3,300,000 people in the United States. The text notes that the condition causes painful nodules, abscesses, and profound psychological distress. It also points out that many individuals face delayed diagnoses, which contribute to worse disease progression and higher healthcare costs. Finally, the resolution recognizes the importance of increasing public awareness, promoting timely diagnoses, supporting biomedical research, and advancing policies to improve care for patients and their caregivers.
Yes· 3 of 12
- Scored +4
Does this make health care easier to get in general?
The resolution recognizes the importance of improving access to care and therapies for individuals with hidradenitis suppurativa.
- Scored +3
Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this?
The resolution notes that individuals are frequently diagnosed in the prime of their lives, making this awareness beneficial for young adults.
- Scored +3
Would people with disabilities be better off under this?
Aids individuals dealing with chronic physical suffering and reduced quality of life due to a severe skin disease.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Recognizing the importance of increasing awareness and education about the disease among the public and health professionals, as outlined in Resolved (2)(A), which could help address the issue where 75 percent of individuals are misdiagnosed or diagnosed late.
-
Promoting timely and accurate diagnosis through improved screening and culturally competent care, as noted in Resolved (2)(B), which may help prevent missed critical windows for early intervention.
-
Supporting biomedical research to better understand the disease and accelerating the development of effective treatments while expanding access to existing therapies, according to Resolved (2)(C) and (D), which addresses the urgent need for new treatments and better patient outcomes.
-
Advancing policies that improve access to care and quality of life for people living with the condition and their caregivers, found in Resolved (2)(E), which aims to help those whose ability to work and participate fully in society is affected.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Based on the provided text, there are no specific sections or provisions identified that would cause negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would people with disabilities be better off under this? — Aids individuals dealing with chronic physical suffering and reduced quality of life due to a severe skin disease. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — The resolution notes that individuals are frequently diagnosed in the prime of their lives, making this awareness beneficial for young adults. Would children be better off under this? — The awareness week can help younger demographics recognize symptoms earlier, preventing delayed diagnosis. Would people in middle age be better off under this? — Supports ongoing healthcare and policy improvements affecting individuals managing chronic conditions in middle age. Would women be better off under this? — Hidradenitis suppurativa disproportionately affects women, making awareness efforts particularly beneficial to them. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Aims to reduce avoidable emergency room visits and healthcare costs associated with delayed diagnoses. Would men be better off under this? — Supports overall medical awareness that benefits male patients suffering from the condition. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — Promotes better access to care and therapies that can reduce overall financial burdens from chronic illness. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — Provides general support for health awareness that may benefit older individuals affected by skin conditions.
- Healthcare
- Does this make health care easier to get in general? — The resolution recognizes the importance of improving access to care and therapies for individuals with hidradenitis suppurativa. Does this put more money into medical research? — The resolution expresses support for encouraging biomedical research to better understand and treat hidradenitis suppurativa.
- Education And Technology
- Does this put more money into scientific research? — The resolution supports promoting biomedical research to improve outcomes for hidradenitis suppurativa patients.
- 9/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/2/2026
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
John JoyceRepublican · Pennsylvania
Kevin MullinDemocrat · California