Marcy Kaptur (D-OH)
Expressing support for the designation of the week of May 8 through May 17, 2026, as "National American Birding Week".
A Democratic resolution with 2 Republican cosponsors · See all 6 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution expresses support for designating the week of May 8 through May 17, 2026, as ``National American Birding Week''. It recognizes that birding generates billions of dollars in economic benefits every year. The text notes that migratory bird populations face various natural and human-caused threats to their survival. It also highlights coordinated efforts between governments, conservation groups, and businesses to promote bird conservation and economic development. Finally, the resolution encourages the public to attend birding events to learn about migration and support preservation efforts.
Yes· 3 of 7
- Scored +2
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?
The resolution encourages public participation in efforts to preserve migratory bird populations.
- Scored +1
Would business owners be better off under this?
The resolution recognizes the massive economic benefits and industry support generated by birding activities.
- Scored +1
Would students be better off under this?
The resolution encourages public engagement and learning through birding events.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Economic Benefits: The resolution recognizes that birding is a pastime that generates billions in economic benefits annually (Section 2). This is supported by the fact that an estimated 96,000,000 American birders spend almost $107,000,000,000 annually on birdwatching activities, creating 1,400,000 jobs (Whereas clause).
-
Conservation and Education: The resolution encourages the public to attend events to learn about bird migration and support efforts to preserve bird populations (Section 5). This is part of a multifaceted approach that combines research, education, and outreach to promote conservation (Whereas clause).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are mentioned in the text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — The resolution recognizes the massive economic benefits and industry support generated by birding activities. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — The resolution highlights economic development and conservation efforts linked to wildlife refuges and state wildlife areas. Would students be better off under this? — The resolution encourages public engagement and learning through birding events.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this make it easier to run a small business? — The resolution highlights the economic development driven by birding activities and private sector partnerships. Is this likely to create jobs? — The resolution recognizes that birdwatching activities create 1,400,000 jobs.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? — The resolution encourages public participation in efforts to preserve migratory bird populations.
- Education And Technology
- Does this put more money into public schools? — The resolution promotes educational outreach regarding bird migration and conservation.
- 5/12/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/11/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/30/2026
- Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E398)
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
- 4 Cosponsors added.
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Debbie DingellDemocrat · Michigan
Robert LattaRepublican · Ohio
Frank MrvanDemocrat · Indiana
Janice SchakowskyDemocrat · Illinois
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Tony WiedRepublican · Wisconsin