Robert Garcia (D-CA)
Directing the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of the House of Representatives to initiate or intervene in judicial proceedings.
A Democratic resolution with 20 Democratic cosponsors · See all 20 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Rules.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution directs the chair of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform to take legal action in federal court. The goal is to seek a declaratory judgment regarding Pamela J. Bondi's duty to comply with a subpoena issued on March 17, 2026. This subpoena concerns deposition testimony for an investigation into how the Federal Government enforces sex trafficking laws. Specifically, the investigation looks at the Department of Justice's management of files related to Jeffrey Epstein and his co-conspirators. The chair must act within 30 days of the resolution's approval and report progress to the House.
Yes
- Scored +5
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The resolution seeks to compel testimony and document production regarding the management of sensitive federal files to increase oversight.
- Scored +3
Would women be better off under this?
The investigation into sex trafficking law enforcement may lead to better protections and accountability for women.
- Scored +2
Does this change how police departments operate?
The investigation into DOJ document management regarding sex trafficking laws could lead to increased accountability in law enforcement processes.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Investigation of Sex Trafficking Laws: The resolution aims to further an investigation into the Federal Government's enforcement of sex trafficking laws and the Department of Justice's handling of files related to Jeffrey Epstein and his co-conspirators. This could lead to greater transparency regarding how these sensitive matters are managed.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts or burdens are explicitly stated in the text of the resolution.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The resolution seeks to compel testimony and document production regarding the management of sensitive federal files to increase oversight.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would women be better off under this? — The investigation into sex trafficking law enforcement may lead to better protections and accountability for women.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this change how police departments operate? — The investigation into DOJ document management regarding sex trafficking laws could lead to increased accountability in law enforcement processes.
- 4/29/2026
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Rules.
- 20 Cosponsors added.
Yassamin AnsariDemocrat · Arizona
Shontel BrownDemocrat · Ohio
Wesley BellDemocrat · Missouri
Jasmine CrockettDemocrat · Texas
Greg CasarDemocrat · Texas
Maxwell FrostDemocrat · Florida
Ro KhannaDemocrat · California
Raja KrishnamoorthiDemocrat · Illinois
Stephen LynchDemocrat · Massachusetts
Summer LeeDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Kweisi MfumeDemocrat · Maryland
Dave MinDemocrat · California
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Ayanna PressleyDemocrat · Massachusetts
Emily RandallDemocrat · Washington
Melanie StansburyDemocrat · New Mexico
Suhas SubramanyamDemocrat · Virginia
Lateefah SimonDemocrat · California
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
James WalkinshawDemocrat · Virginia