Celeste Maloy (R-UT)
Supporting recognition of 2026 as the "International Year of Rangelands and Pastoralists".
A Republican resolution with 2 Democratic cosponsors · See all 8 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution expresses support for recognizing 2026 as the "International Year of Rangelands and Pastoralists." It highlights the economic, social, and ecological importance of rangelands in the United States. The text notes that these lands are vital for food production, water resources, and wildlife habitat. It specifically recognizes the role of ranchers and pastoralists in managing these landscapes. Finally, the resolution encourages various institutions to engage in activities related to rangeland management.
Yes· 3 of 10
- Scored +1
Would business owners be better off under this?
The resolution recognizes the economic and social contributions of ranchers and land managers.
- Scored +1
Would farmers be better off under this?
The resolution explicitly recognizes the importance of farmers in the domestic production of food and fiber.
- Scored +1
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?
The resolution highlights how rangelands support the viability of rural communities.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Recognition of Economic and Social Value: The resolution recognizes the economic, social, and ecological importance of rangelands and the people who care for them (Resolution Clause 2).
-
Educational and Research Opportunities: The resolution encourages Federal agencies, universities, and organizations to participate in education, research, and outreach regarding rangeland management (Resolution Clause 3).
-
Highlighting Professional Contributions: The designation provides a way for the United States to showcase the work of ranchers, farmers, scientists, and land managers (Whereas clause regarding the International Year).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts or burdens are mentioned in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — The resolution recognizes the economic and social contributions of ranchers and land managers. Would farmers be better off under this? — The resolution explicitly recognizes the importance of farmers in the domestic production of food and fiber. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — The resolution highlights how rangelands support the viability of rural communities.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? — The text highlights the role of pastoral grazing in increasing biodiversity and making rangelands more resilient. Does this invest in rural communities? — The resolution highlights the role of rangelands in supporting rural community viability. Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change? — The resolution identifies rangelands as important for carbon sequestration and storage.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this make it easier to run a small business? — The resolution recognizes the economic importance of ranchers and pastoralists as vital contributors to their communities. Is this likely to create jobs? — The resolution highlights the economic importance of rangelands and the role of ranchers and farmers in domestic food production.
- Education And Technology
- Does this put more money into scientific research? — The resolution encourages universities and organizations to engage in research related to rangeland management.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this strengthen ties with allied countries? — The resolution supports a United Nations designation intended to highlight rangeland management globally.
- 7/13/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/27/2026
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 7 Cosponsors added.
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Jim CostaDemocrat · California
Sharice DavidsDemocrat · Kansas
Gabe EvansRepublican · Colorado
Russ FulcherRepublican · Idaho
Glenn GrothmanRepublican · Wisconsin
Harriet HagemanRepublican · Wyoming
Kimberlyn King-HindsRepublican · Northern Mariana Islands
Tracey MannRepublican · Kansas