Bill Foster (D-IL)

Expressing support for the continued value of arms control agreements and negotiated constraints on Russian and Chinese strategic nuclear forces.

H.Res. 100 · House resolution International Affairs

A Democratic resolution with 31 Democratic cosponsors · See all 31 cosponsors

Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

In committee

Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.

The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.

Its path through Congress

  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.

What this bill would do

H. Res. 100 expresses support for the continued value of arms control agreements and negotiated constraints on Russian and Chinese strategic nuclear forces. The text condemns the Russian Federation's nuclear escalatory rhetoric, veiled threats, and its purported suspension of the New START Treaty. It emphasizes the importance of transparency, verification measures, and onsite inspections that have provided insight into Russia's nuclear arsenal. The resolution calls for an immediate cessation of nuclear saber rattling and urges the Russian Federation to return to full implementation of the New START Treaty. Additionally, it calls on the administration to pursue a dialogue with Russia on a new post-2026 nuclear arms control framework and to continue engaging the People's Republic of China in bilateral talks on nuclear risk reduction and arms control.

Yes· 3 of 7

  • Scored +7

    Does this favour talking over confrontation abroad?

    The resolution calls for active dialogue with Russia and China regarding nuclear risk reduction and new arms control frameworks.

  • Scored +5

    Does this reduce what is spent on the military?

    By pursuing arms control frameworks, the resolution seeks to avoid the high costs of a new nuclear arms race.

  • Scored +5

    Does this reduce what the federal government spends?

    The resolution aims to prevent a costly and unrestrained nuclear arms race through continued arms control agreements.

The opposite

No question was scored the opposite.