Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL)

TPS Review Act

H.R. 9944 · House bill Immigration

A Democratic bill with 72 Democratic cosponsors · See all 72 cosponsors

Last activity — Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

In committee

Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.

The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.

Its path through Congress

  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

What this bill would do

This bill, known as the "TPS Review Act," aims to change how the government handles the ending of Temporary Protected Status (TPS). It updates the law to ensure that when the Secretary of Homeland Security decides to end a TPS designation, there is a clear process for judicial review. The bill requires the Secretary to provide written findings of fact and legal conclusions for such decisions. It also establishes that these termination decisions are subject to review in federal court. Furthermore, it defines these termination actions as "major rules" under the Administrative Procedure Act. Finally, the act provides specific protections for individuals while their cases are being reviewed in court.

Yes· 3 of 6

  • Scored +9

    Would immigrants be better off under this?

    The bill provides substantial protections and legal recourse for immigrants holding Temporary Protected Status.

  • Scored +8

    Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?

    The bill enhances due process for TPS holders by establishing judicial review and a clear burden of proof for the government.

  • Scored +7

    Does this make it easier for immigrants already here to become citizens?

    The bill strengthens protections for TPS holders, providing legal stability and pathways to maintain their status through judicial review.

The opposite

No question was scored the opposite.