A Republican bill with 2 Democratic cosponsors · See all 3 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "Promoting Access to Transit in High-Growth Communities Act" or the "PATH Act," seeks to amend title 49 of the United States Code. It focuses on the fixed guideway capital investment grants program. The amendment aims to change how ridership forecasting methods are used to determine if a project is justified. Specifically, it allows for forecasting that accounts for population density, population growth rates, and development planning activities.
Yes
- Scored +3
Would people in cities be better off under this?
Improved transit access can benefit high-density urban areas undergoing growth.
- Scored +3
Does this improve buses, trains and other public transport?
The bill facilitates transit projects by allowing more flexible ridership forecasting that accounts for future growth.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Improved project justification: The bill allows ridership forecasting to include population growth rates and development planning activities (Section 2 de, subsection (d)(2)(B)(A) and (ii)). This could be positive as it considers how a community is growing rather than just its current state.
-
Flexible forecasting methods: The amendment allows for the use of whichever factor—population density or population growth rate—is most beneficial to the ridership forecasting for a specific project (Section 2 de, subsection (d)(2)(B)(ii)). This ensures the forecasting can adapt to the specific needs of a project's corridor.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts are explicitly stated in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would people in cities be better off under this? — Improved transit access can benefit high-density urban areas undergoing growth.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this improve buses, trains and other public transport? — The bill facilitates transit projects by allowing more flexible ridership forecasting that accounts for future growth.
- 7/23/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Mike KennedyRepublican · Utah
Greg StantonDemocrat · Arizona
Dina TitusDemocrat · Nevada