Shontel Brown (D-OH)
GET THE LEAD OUT Act of 2026
A Democratic bill with 1 Democratic cosponsor · See the cosponsor
Last activity — Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Financial Services, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "GET THE LEAD OUT Act of 2026," aims to eliminate lead-based pipe and tap hazards in residential housing. It establishes a national strategy to evaluate and reduce these hazards in both private and federally assisted housing. The legislation provides for various grants to help states and local governments perform risk assessments, inspections, and abatements. It also mandates training and certification for contractors and establishes a task force to improve financing and safety standards. Additionally, the bill includes new disclosure requirements for property transfers to protect buyers and tenants. Finally, it contains several revenue provisions regarding partnership interests and estate taxes.
Yes· 3 of 15
- Scored +10
Would children be better off under this?
The bill's primary objective is to prevent childhood lead poisoning by reducing water-borne hazards.
- Scored +8
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?
The bill establishes a national strategy to eliminate toxic lead-based pipe hazards in residential water systems.
- Scored +7
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
The bill prioritizes assistance and risk assessments for priority and affordable housing used by low-income families.
The opposite
- Scored -5
Does this cut the tax on money left behind when someone dies?
The bill reduces the estate tax burden by returning to the pre-2018 basic exclusion amount.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Reduction of Lead Poisoning Risks: The bill seeks to prevent childhood lead poisoning by evaluating and reducing lead-based pipe and tap hazards in various housing types (Section 2).
-
Financial Assistance for Housing Improvements: Grants can be used to provide assistance to owners and occupants of priority housing for risk assessments, interim controls, and the total abatement of lead hazards (Section 101(e)).
-
Consumer Protections in Real Estate: The bill requires sellers or lessors to disclose known lead-based pipe hazards and provides purchasers a 10-day window to conduct inspections before they are obligated to a contract (Section 107(a)).
-
Support for Displaced Families: Grant funds can be used to assist in the temporary relocation of families who must vacate their homes while lead reduction work is being performed (Section 101(e)(6)).
-
Public Education: The legislation funds efforts to educate the public about the nature of lead poisoning and the steps necessary to reduce exposure (Section 101(e)(7) and Section 204(d)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Increased Costs for Property Owners: Sellers or lessors may face new requirements to provide lead hazard information pamphlets and disclose known hazards during property transfers (Section 107(a)).
-
New Fees for Contractors: The Environmental Protection Agency or States may impose fees on certified contractors and those operating accredited training programs (Section 201(a)(3)).
-
Increased Legal Liability: Individuals who knowingly violate the disclosure or safety provisions regarding lead hazards may be subject to civil money penalties and are potentially liable for triple the amount of damages incurred (Section 107(c)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would children be better off under this? — The bill's primary objective is to prevent childhood lead poisoning by reducing water-borne hazards. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The bill prioritizes assistance and risk assessments for priority and affordable housing used by low-income families. Would people in cities be better off under this? — The bill targets residential housing density and safety which is highly relevant to urban environments. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — The bill provides tools and information for homeowners to manage lead hazards in their properties. Would women be better off under this? — The bill highlights the reduction of lead risks for pregnant women and those of childbearing age.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices? — The bill mandates the disclosure of lead-based pipe hazards during property transfers to protect buyers and tenants. Does this raise taxes on the highest earners? — The bill recharacterizes partnership interests in investment services as ordinary income and increases penalties for underpayments. Does this make it easier to run a small business? — The bill provides grants for lead hazard reduction that can support local housing markets and small-scale improvements. Is this likely to grow the economy? — The bill invests heavily in housing infrastructure through significant HUD and EPA funding. Does this cut the tax on money left behind when someone dies? — The bill reduces the estate tax burden by returning to the pre-2018 basic exclusion amount.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? — The bill establishes a national strategy to eliminate toxic lead-based pipe hazards in residential water systems. Does this repair or build roads and bridges? — The bill invests in the national building stock infrastructure by addressing water-related hazards.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this make housing cost less? — The bill provides grants and financing mechanisms specifically to reduce hazards in priority and affordable housing. Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — By targeting lead hazards in priority housing, the bill seeks to improve the living conditions of low-income families.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill requires new disclosures for residential property transfers, increasing transparency for buyers and tenants.
- Healthcare
- Does this do more about addiction and overdose deaths? — The bill's focus on lead toxicity reduction is a significant public health preventive measure.
- 7/22/2026
- Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Financial Services, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan