A Democratic bill with 4 Republican cosponsors · See all 8 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, and Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The "SECURE 340B Act" aims to strengthen the 340B drug discount program through increased oversight and transparency. It introduces clearer definitions for patients and specific requirements for prescribing providers and non-hospital entities. The legislation implements stricter standards for contract pharmacies, child sites, and subgrantees to ensure program integrity. It enhances patient affordability by mandizing financial assistance policies, sliding fee scales, and medical debt protections. Additionally, the bill mandates various studies by the Secretary and the Comptroller General regarding dispensing fees, discount retention, and hospital debt collection practices. Finally, it establishes a data clearinghouse and provides resources for increased auditing and enforcement.
Yes· 3 of 10
- Scored +8
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
The bill provides direct benefits through sliding fee scales, financial assistance, and medical debt protections.
- Scored +7
Does this lower the price of prescription medicines?
The bill strengthens the 340B program to ensure discounted drugs are more accessible and affordable for patients.
- Scored +6
Does this make health care easier to get in general?
Enhanced oversight and financial assistance policies aim to improve healthcare access for underserved populations.
The opposite
- Scored -3
Would business owners be better off under this?
Covered entities face increased administrative burdens and potential loss of program eligibility.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Clearer Patient Definition: Establishing specific criteria for who qualifies as a "patient" clarifies the relationship between covered entities and those receiving care (Section 2).
-
Increased Affordability via Financial Assistance: Covered entities must maintain and extend financial assistance policies to patients at their child sites and contract pharmacies (Section 5).
-
Sliding Fee Scales: Certain covered entities are required to use sliding fee scales for covered outpatient drugs to assist patients (Section 5).
-
Medical Debt Protections: The bill prohibits certain covered entities from selling patient debt to third parties, reporting adverse information to credit bureaus, or denying medically necessary care due to non-payment (Section 5).
-
Expanded Access through Referrals: Certain entities, such as critical access hospitals, can provide discounted drugs to patients referred by the covered entity (Section 2).
-
Transparency in Pharmacy Arrangements: The Secretary is required to make information regarding contract pharmacy arrangements available on a public website (Section 3).
-
Increased Transparency of Pharmacy Fees: The Secretary will study dispensing fees and reimbursements paid to pharmacies to determine if they are reasonable (Section (a)(1)).
-
Improved Oversight of the 340B Discount: The Comptroller General will study how the 340B discount is retained by various entities, including contract pharmacies, health plans, and patients (Section (b)(1)).
-
Scrutiny of Hospital Debt Collection: The Comptroller General will report on the debt collection practices of hospitals, including those in the 340B program (Section (c)).
-
Enhanced Monitoring of Care for Low-Income Populations: The Comptroller0 General will analyze contracts between local governments and certain non-profit hospitals to assess care provided to individuals at or below 400 percent of the Federal Poverty Level (Section (d)(1)(B)).
-
Protection of Underserved Populations: The bill requires an analysis of how violations impact the ability of Federally Qualified Health Centers to provide affordable care to underserved populations (Section (d)(1)(E)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Increased Administrative Burden for Entities: Covered entities must maintain extensive auditable health care records and undergo regular audits (Section 2).
-
Strict Eligibility Requirements for Child Sites: To participate, child sites must meet rigorous integration, ownership, and community need standards (Section 4).
-
New Costs for Covered Entities: A user fee program is established where entities pay a fee based on their previous year's drug purchases (Section 10).
-
Potential Loss of Discount Eligibility: Entities may lose eligibility for the drug discount program if they fail to comply with required corrective action plans (Section 2).
-
Mandatory Data Transmission: Entities are required to participate in a new data transmission process through a third-party clearinghouse (Section 8).
-
Increased Administrative Burden for Non-Hospital Entities: Non-hospital covered entities and subgrantees face strict new requirements, including enforceable written agreements, specific record-keeping, and registration in a central system (Section 13(i)).
-
Strict Participation Limitations: Participation for certain entities is tied to specific conditions, such as being a nonprofit or public entity and ensuring services are within the scope of Federal grants (Section 13(i)(I)).
-
Potential Loss of Program Access: Subgrantees may need to disenroll from the program if they no longer meet specific requirements, such as demographic thresholds related to State Medicaid enrollment (Section 13(ii)(III) and (V)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The bill provides direct benefits through sliding fee scales, financial assistance, and medical debt protections. Would retired people be better off under this? — The protections for the 340B program may benefit seniors and retirees who rely on these drug discounts. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — The bill helps seniors by stabilizing the 340B program which affects medication accessibility. Would business owners be better off under this? — Covered entities face increased administrative burdens and potential loss of program eligibility.
- Healthcare
- Does this lower the price of prescription medicines? — The bill strengthens the 340B program to ensure discounted drugs are more accessible and affordable for patients. Does this make health care easier to get in general? — Enhanced oversight and financial assistance policies aim to improve healthcare access for underserved populations.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill mandates public disclosure of contract pharmacy arrangements and drug savings data. Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill expands the oversight and regulatory authority of the Secretary and HRSA.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices? — The bill enhances protections for patients regarding medical debt collection and prohibits discrimination against 340B entities.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — The bill targets financial assistance and debt protections for low-income individuals.
- Education And Technology
- Does this give people more control over their personal data? — The bill mandates data security and privacy standards for the new drug discount clearinghouse.
- 10/5/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/17/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 8/31/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/6/2026
- Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, and Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Jake AuchinclossDemocrat · Massachusetts
Nanette BarragánDemocrat · California
Dan CrenshawRepublican · Texas
Neal DunnRepublican · Florida
Vicente GonzalezDemocrat · Texas
John JoyceRepublican · Pennsylvania
Carol MillerRepublican · West Virginia
Kevin MullinDemocrat · California