A Republican bill with 11 Republican cosponsors · See all 11 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is known as the Reforming Cement Manufacturing for Enhanced Material Efficiency and New Technology Act or the ReCement Act. It was introduced in the House of Representatives on June 11, 2026. The legislation amends the Solid Waste Disposal Act. Specifically, it changes the definition of what counts as solid waste. The bill excludes certain recovered materials, recovered resources, and non-hazardous secondary materials from the definition of solid waste. These materials can then be used as ingredients or fuels in making cement or clinker under specific conditions.
Yes· 3 of 6
- Scored +5
Would business owners be better off under this?
Reduces regulatory burdens for cement manufacturers by reclassifying certain materials.
- Scored +3
Is this likely to grow the economy?
Encourages industrial efficiency and the use of recovered resources in manufacturing.
- Scored +2
Is this likely to create jobs?
Increased material efficiency in cement manufacturing may support industry growth and employment.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 2 amends the Solid Waste Disposal Act to exclude non-hazardous secondary materials determined to be non-waste under specific federal regulations from the definition of solid waste. This could benefit people by clarifying what materials can be used without being restricted as waste.
-
Section 2 excludes certain recovered materials or recovered resources from the definition of solid waste if they are used as an ingredient or fuel in place of a traditional ingredient or fuel in manufacturing cement or clinker. This might be seen as positive because it allows certain materials to be utilized as valuable commodities rather than being treated as garbage, provided they are managed properly.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- The provided text does not explicitly mention any potential negative impacts, burdens, or consequences for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — Reduces regulatory burdens for cement manufacturers by reclassifying certain materials.
- Economy And Finance
- Is this likely to grow the economy? — Encourages industrial efficiency and the use of recovered resources in manufacturing. Is this likely to create jobs? — Increased material efficiency in cement manufacturing may support industry growth and employment.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change? — Using recovered materials as fuel can reduce reliance on primary carbon-intensive fuels. Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? — Promotes the circular economy by reducing waste sent to landfills. Does this reduce how much oil, gas and coal is produced? — Substitution of traditional fuels with recovered resources may slightly decrease fossil fuel demand.
- 9/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/10/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/20/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 7/13/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/9/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/11/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- Introduced in House
Mike BostRepublican · Illinois
James BairdRepublican · Indiana
Tim BurchettRepublican · Tennessee
Juan CiscomaniRepublican · Arizona
Gabe EvansRepublican · Colorado
Mike FloodRepublican · Nebraska
Randy FineRepublican · Florida
Jeff HurdRepublican · Colorado
Ryan MackenzieRepublican · Pennsylvania
August PflugerRepublican · Texas
Derek SchmidtRepublican · Kansas