Lauren Boebert (R-CO)
Local Data for Better Conservation Act
A Republican bill with 6 Republican cosponsors · See all 6 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is called the "Local Data for Better Conservation Act." It seeks to amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973. Specifically, it requires the Secretary to accept and integrate data collected by States when making decisions to list or delist a species as threatened or endangered.
Yes· 3 of 5
- Scored +5
Does this leave more decisions to the states?
Empowers states by requiring federal agencies to accept state-collected data.
- Scored +3
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?
Rural areas often rely on state-level ecological data and are most affected by ESA listings.
- Scored +3
Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests?
Allows for more localized data to inform land management via endangered species listing.
The opposite
- Scored -3
Does this give the federal government more power?
Reduces sole federal discretion by requiring the integration of state data.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Integration of State Data: By requiring the Secretary to accept and integrate State-collected data (Section 2), the process for listing or delisting species may rely on information gathered at the local state level.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts for people are explicitly mentioned in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — Rural areas often rely on state-level ecological data and are most affected by ESA listings. Would farmers be better off under this? — State-level data may lead to more flexible listing determinations affecting agricultural land use.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests? — Allows for more localized data to inform land management via endangered species listing. Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? — Integrates state-level data for potentially more accurate species conservation decisions.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this leave more decisions to the states? — Empowers states by requiring federal agencies to accept state-collected data. Does this give the federal government more power? — Reduces sole federal discretion by requiring the integration of state data.
- 6/9/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/8/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
- 5 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Jeff CrankRepublican · Colorado
Troy DowningRepublican · Montana
Gabe EvansRepublican · Colorado
Russ FulcherRepublican · Idaho
Jeff HurdRepublican · Colorado
Mike KennedyRepublican · Utah