Seth Moulton (D-MA)
American High-Speed Rail Act
A Democratic bill with 56 Democratic cosponsors · See all 56 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill updates federal laws related to high-speed and higher-speed rail corridors in the United States. It allows for up to 100 percent federal funding for certain corridor planning and capital projects, provided that a portion of the costs uses specified financial sources. The legislation authorizes billions of dollars in appropriations for fiscal years 2027 through 2031 for planning, technology improvements, and corridor development. It includes provisions for acquiring property and freight rail right-of-way, sets rules for presidential border permits, and outlines labor protections and tax exclusions for rail carriers. Additionally, it establishes a pilot program for transit-oriented development planning focused on high-speed rail communities.
Yes· 3 of 14
- Scored +9
Does this improve buses, trains and other public transport?
The bill provides massive funding and regulatory changes to expand and modernize the national high-speed rail network.
- Scored +7
Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change?
The promotion of high-speed rail as a sustainable alternative to highway travel helps reduce carbon emissions.
- Scored +6
Would union members be better off under this?
The bill enhances labor protections and subjects certain rail service providers to union-related laws.
The opposite
- Scored -2
Does this reduce what the federal government owes?
The bill authorizes significant new federal spending for rail corridors and technology.
- Scored -2
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?
The provision for 'advance acquisition' of land before environmental reviews are complete may reduce certain due process elements for property owners.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 2(b) permits up to 100 percent federal funding for corridor planning when working with public agencies or private entities, which can help communities plan modern rail systems without heavy local upfront costs.
-
Section 2(f) allows the federal share of net capital costs for high-speed rail projects to be up to 100 percent, potentially easing the financial burden on state and local taxpayers.
-
Section 4 provides $20,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2027 through 2031 for transit-oriented development planning, giving greater consideration to communities where high-speed rail projects occur to help local areas grow around new stations.
-
Section 6 excludes certain gains, grants, and capital improvements from the gross income of rail carriers for tax purposes, and provides grants to freight rail carriers that acquire additional real property when they sell or lease land for rail projects, which supports cooperation between passenger and freight rail.
-
Section 7 ensures specific labor protections by applying laws like the Railroad Retirement Act and the Railway Labor Act to operators and service providers working on grant-funded rail infrastructure.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Section 3 authorizes massive appropriations of billions of dollars for each fiscal year from 2027 through 2031 for corridor planning, technology improvements, and corridor development, which significantly increases federal spending that taxpayers ultimately fund.
-
Section 2(g) directs the Secretary of State to provide necessary presidential permits for international border projects unless it is determined not to be in the interest of national security, which removes certain discretionary hurdles but could raise concerns regarding local environmental or border oversight.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would union members be better off under this? — The bill enhances labor protections and subjects certain rail service providers to union-related laws. Would business owners be better off under this? — Improved infrastructure and connectivity can benefit various business sectors and transit-oriented developments. Would people in cities be better off under this? — Increased transit connectivity and transit-oriented development often benefit urbanized areas. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Improved transit connectivity can provide better access to jobs for low-income residents. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — High-speed rail offers more efficient travel options for commuters.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this improve buses, trains and other public transport? — The bill provides massive funding and regulatory changes to expand and modernize the national high-speed rail network. Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change? — The promotion of high-speed rail as a sustainable alternative to highway travel helps reduce carbon emissions. Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? — The bill includes requirements for environmental reviews during land acquisition processes.
- Economy And Finance
- Is this likely to grow the economy? — The bill promotes economic development through new high-speed rail corridors and transit-oriented development. Is this likely to create jobs? — The investment in high-speed rail infrastructure and technology is expected to stimulate job creation in the transportation and construction sectors. Does this strengthen the rights of workers to organise? — The bill extends specific labor protections and benefits, such as the Railroad Retirement Act, to certain rail operators and service providers. Does this reduce what the federal government owes? — The bill authorizes significant new federal spending for rail corridors and technology.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make it easier to do business across state lines? — The expansion of high-speed rail corridors facilitates interstate movement and commerce. Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill expands the Secretary of Transportation's authority over corridor designation and land acquisition. Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts? — The provision for 'advance acquisition' of land before environmental reviews are complete may reduce certain due process elements for property owners.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this make housing cost less? — The bill supports transit-oriented development which can facilitate more affordable living near transit hubs.
- 9/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/13/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/23/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/3/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 5/26/2026
- Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 47 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Jake AuchinclossDemocrat · Massachusetts
Suzanne BonamiciDemocrat · Oregon
Donald BeyerDemocrat · Virginia
Brendan BoyleDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Emanuel CleaverDemocrat · Missouri
Steve CohenDemocrat · Tennessee
André CarsonDemocrat · Indiana
Sean CastenDemocrat · Illinois
Danny DavisDemocrat · Illinois
Lloyd DoggettDemocrat · Texas
Christopher DeluzioDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Suzan DelBeneDemocrat · Washington
Dwight EvansDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Maxwell FrostDemocrat · Florida
Valerie FousheeDemocrat · North Carolina
Shomari FiguresDemocrat · Alabama
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey
Jesús GarcíaDemocrat · Illinois
Sylvia GarciaDemocrat · Texas
Robert GarciaDemocrat · California
Daniel GoldmanDemocrat · New York
Henry JohnsonDemocrat · Georgia
Jonathan JacksonDemocrat · Illinois
Robin KellyDemocrat · Illinois
Timothy KennedyDemocrat · New York
Zoe LofgrenDemocrat · California
John LarsonDemocrat · Connecticut
Summer LeeDemocrat · Pennsylvania
George LatimerDemocrat · New York
James McGovernDemocrat · Massachusetts
Morgan McGarveyDemocrat · Kentucky
Kevin MullinDemocrat · California
Jennifer McClellanDemocrat · Virginia
LaMonica McIverDemocrat · New Jersey
Sarah McBrideDemocrat · Delaware
Analilia MejiaDemocrat · New Jersey
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Alexandria Ocasio-CortezDemocrat · New York
Ilhan OmarDemocrat · Minnesota
Mark PocanDemocrat · Wisconsin
Ayanna PressleyDemocrat · Massachusetts
Mike QuigleyDemocrat · Illinois
Delia RamirezDemocrat · Illinois
Adam SmithDemocrat · Washington
Janice SchakowskyDemocrat · Illinois
Marilyn StricklandDemocrat · Washington
Thomas SuozziDemocrat · New York
Andrea SalinasDemocrat · Oregon
Lateefah SimonDemocrat · California
Mark TakanoDemocrat · California
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Lori TrahanDemocrat · Massachusetts
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan
Juan VargasDemocrat · California
Eugene VindmanDemocrat · Virginia
Bonnie Watson ColemanDemocrat · New Jersey