A Democratic bill with 5 Democratic cosponsors · See all 5 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
H.R. 9031 establishes a new refundable tax credit called the Young Adult Tax Credit for individuals between the ages of 18 and 25. Under this bill, eligible young adults or their claiming taxpayers receive a monthly allowance of $500 per person. The bill sets up a program for monthly advance payments distributed through electronic funds transfer. It also requires the Treasury Secretary to create a multilingual, mobile-friendly online portal for managing these payments. Additionally, the legislation mandates an outreach campaign to inform the public and assist underrepresented populations in claiming the credit. The provisions within this bill take effect for taxable years and calendar months beginning after December 31, 2026.
Yes· 3 of 28
- Scored +9
Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this?
The bill directly benefits individuals aged 18 to 25 by providing a refundable tax credit of $500 per month.
- Scored +8
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
Low-income households and individuals benefit substantially from the refundable tax credit and targeted outreach.
- Scored +7
Is this likely to lift people out of poverty?
Providing $500 monthly to young adults directly helps reduce poverty among a demographic transitioning to financial independence.
The opposite· 3 of 4
- Scored -3
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?
The legislation introduces a significant new ongoing entitlement program involving monthly disbursements and administrative costs.
- Scored -2
Does this reduce what the federal government owes?
The creation of a new refundable tax credit and monthly advance payment program increases government spending and reduces revenue.
- Scored -2
Does this make the government pay for what it commits to?
The bill creates new mandatory spending without offsetting revenue provisions.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 2 creates the monthly young adult tax credit, providing $500 per month for citizens, nationals, or residents who are at least 18 and under 25 years old, which directly puts money into the pockets of young adults and families.
-
Section 2 establishes a monthly advance payment program under section 7527B, allowing people to receive their financial support on a monthly basis rather than waiting for an annual tax refund.
-
Section 2 protects advance payments from being reduced or offset by federal taxes, past-due debts, or general legal garnishments, ensuring that recipients actually keep the financial relief provided.
-
Section 2 requires the creation of an online information portal that is mobile-friendly and available in multiple languages, making it easier for everyday people to manage their payments and eligibility.
-
Section 3 directs the Treasury Secretary to conduct an outreach campaign prioritizing underrepresented populations who are less likely to file taxes or have bank accounts, helping vulnerable Americans access the benefits they are owed.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Section 2 includes a recapture provision that increases a taxpayer's tax liability if they receive advance payments based on fraud, reckless or intentional disregard of rules, or specific administrative notices, which could result in unexpected tax burdens.
-
Section 2 mandates that taxpayers must include correct identification numbers for themselves and their dependents by the filing deadline, meaning simple paperwork errors or missing numbers will completely deny them the credit.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — The bill directly benefits individuals aged 18 to 25 by providing a refundable tax credit of $500 per month. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Low-income households and individuals benefit substantially from the refundable tax credit and targeted outreach. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — Middle-class families with young adult dependents will see financial benefits from the credit. Would students be better off under this? — Provides consistent monthly funds to students aged 18-25 to help cover living and educational expenses. Would Black Americans be better off under this? — Targeted outreach programs prioritize underrepresented minority populations who are less likely to file taxes. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — Multilingual portals and focused outreach assist Hispanic communities in accessing the credit. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — Outreach initiatives help ensure Native American and remote populations can access the tax credit. Would Asian Americans be better off under this? — Multilingual portal support aids Asian American communities with language barriers in claiming benefits. Would immigrants be better off under this? — Resident citizens and nationals within the age range are eligible, and multilingual services aid accessibility. Would LGBTQ people be better off under this? — Vulnerable LGBTQ youth experiencing high rates of housing instability benefit from the financial assistance. Would men be better off under this? — Young men between 18 and 25 receive direct financial support to assist with living expenses. Would people in middle age be better off under this? — Parents and claiming taxpayers who support young adult dependents may receive financial relief. Would people with disabilities be better off under this? — Young adults with disabilities receive supplemental financial support during early adulthood. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — Rural youth and families receive financial assistance to help offset economic hurdles. Would people in cities be better off under this? — Urban youth benefit from additional income to manage high costs of living. Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together? — Young veterans aged 18 to 25 are eligible for the monthly tax credit. Would white Americans be better off under this? — White low- and middle-income young adults and families benefit broadly from the universal age-based credit. Would women be better off under this? — Young women transitioning into adulthood benefit from the additional monthly financial security.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — Providing $500 monthly to young adults directly helps reduce poverty among a demographic transitioning to financial independence. Is this likely to reduce homelessness? — Financial assistance for young adults can help prevent housing instability and reduce homelessness among vulnerable youth. Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — Targeted outreach to underrepresented and vulnerable populations helps bridge equity gaps in accessing tax benefits.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — Requires the creation of an accessible online portal and structured notification procedures for taxpayers regarding payment changes. Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill expands federal administrative responsibilities through the IRS for monthly payments, portals, and outreach programs. Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts? — Establishes clear procedures and adjudication processes for resolving competing claims regarding dependent status.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this cut taxes for middle-income families? — The bill establishes a refundable tax credit for young adults, reducing overall tax burdens for qualifying individuals and families. Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices? — The bill includes safeguards protecting advance payments from garnishment and offsets, enhancing consumer financial protection. Is this likely to grow the economy? — Providing direct financial support to young adults boosts consumer spending and economic activity among a demographic with high marginal propensity to consume. Does this reduce what the federal government spends? — The legislation introduces a significant new ongoing entitlement program involving monthly disbursements and administrative costs. Does this make the government pay for what it commits to? — The bill creates new mandatory spending without offsetting revenue provisions. Does this reduce what the federal government owes? — The creation of a new refundable tax credit and monthly advance payment program increases government spending and reduces revenue. Is this likely to slow the rise in prices? — Injecting direct monthly cash payments into the economy could marginally increase inflationary pressures.
- Education And Technology
- Does this make college cost less? — The monthly stipend can assist young adults in paying for college expenses and educational costs.
- 5/26/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- 5 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Greg CasarDemocrat · Texas
Robert GarciaDemocrat · California
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Bonnie Watson ColemanDemocrat · New Jersey