Lizzie Fletcher (D-TX)
No Presidential Self-Serving Lawsuits Act of 2026
A Democratic bill with 39 Democratic cosponsors · See all 39 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
H.R. 8968, known as the No Presidential Self-Serving Lawsuits Act of 2026, stops the President from filing a civil lawsuit against the United States. The bill voids the settlement agreement in the specific case of Trump v. Internal Revenue Service. It bans the use of federal funds or the creation of a compensation fund to settle a civil action brought against the United States by a current or former President. The Secretary of the Treasury is also given the power to recover any federal funds that were used in violation of this ban.
Yes· 3 of 6
- Scored +2
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?
The bill protects taxpayer money by preventing federal funds from being used to settle presidential lawsuits and allows for recovery of improperly used funds.
- Scored +2
Does this make the government pay for what it commits to?
By prohibiting the use of federal funds for presidential civil lawsuit settlements, the legislation promotes responsible use of government funds.
- Scored +2
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The legislation enforces accountability and prevents conflicts of interest regarding executive branch legal actions against the United States.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Section 3(a) and Section 3(b) prevent federal funds from being used to settle a civil action brought against the United States by a President or former President, and allow the Treasury to recover improperly used funds. This is positive because it protects taxpayer money from being spent on lawsuits brought by the nation's highest official.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Based on the provided text, there are no specific sections or provisions identified that create negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this make the government pay for what it commits to? — By prohibiting the use of federal funds for presidential civil lawsuit settlements, the legislation promotes responsible use of government funds. Does this reduce what the federal government spends? — The bill protects taxpayer money by preventing federal funds from being used to settle presidential lawsuits and allows for recovery of improperly used funds.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The legislation enforces accountability and prevents conflicts of interest regarding executive branch legal actions against the United States. Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill places specific statutory restrictions on presidential legal actions and empowers the Treasury to recover funds.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Protecting taxpayer funds from being spent on presidential lawsuits indirectly benefits general taxpayers across all income levels. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — Protecting taxpayer funds from being spent on presidential lawsuits indirectly benefits general taxpayers across all income levels.
- 6/30/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/18/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/10/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/4/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/2/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/29/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/26/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 5/22/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 5/21/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 26 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Gabe AmoDemocrat · Rhode Island
Suzanne BonamiciDemocrat · Oregon
Wesley BellDemocrat · Missouri
Steve CohenDemocrat · Tennessee
André CarsonDemocrat · Indiana
Joaquin CastroDemocrat · Texas
Angie CraigDemocrat · Minnesota
Gilbert CisnerosDemocrat · California
Troy CarterDemocrat · Louisiana
Diana DeGetteDemocrat · Colorado
Lloyd DoggettDemocrat · Texas
Christopher DeluzioDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Lois FrankelDemocrat · Florida
Valerie FousheeDemocrat · North Carolina
Al GreenDemocrat · Texas
John GaramendiDemocrat · California
Sylvia GarciaDemocrat · Texas
Steven HorsfordDemocrat · Nevada
Jared HuffmanDemocrat · California
Raja KrishnamoorthiDemocrat · Illinois
Sam LiccardoDemocrat · California
Gwen MooreDemocrat · Wisconsin
Seth MoultonDemocrat · Massachusetts
Jennifer McClellanDemocrat · Virginia
April McClain DelaneyDemocrat · Maryland
Christian MenefeeDemocrat · Texas
Jerrold NadlerDemocrat · New York
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Chellie PingreeDemocrat · Maine
Scott PetersDemocrat · California
Emily RandallDemocrat · Washington
Marilyn StricklandDemocrat · Washington
Andrea SalinasDemocrat · Oregon
Lateefah SimonDemocrat · California
Paul TonkoDemocrat · New York
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Jill TokudaDemocrat · Hawaii
Nikema WilliamsDemocrat · Georgia
Bonnie Watson ColemanDemocrat · New Jersey