A Democratic bill with 36 Democratic cosponsors · See all 36 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The Restoring Overtime Pay Act of 2026 aims to amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. It establishes a new minimum salary threshold for executive, administrative, and professional employees who are exempt from federal overtime pay. This threshold begins at $45,000 and increases annually through 2029 before moving to a system based on national earnings. After 2030, the threshold will be updated annually based on the 55th percentile of weekly earnings for full-time salaried workers. The bill also changes certain duty requirements for these employees.
Yes· 3 of 9
- Scored +6
Would middle-income households be better off under this?
Directly benefits salaried middle-class workers by raising the minimum pay required for exemption from overtime.
- Scored +6
Does this raise the lowest wage an employer may pay?
While not a minimum wage for all, it effectively raises the minimum salary required to be exempt from overtime pay.
- Scored +5
Is this likely to lift people out of poverty?
Increasing the salary threshold for overtime exemptions likely increases earnings for many lower-to-middle management workers.
The opposite
- Scored -6
Would business owners be better off under this?
Imposes higher payroll costs through either higher salaries or additional overtime payments.
- Scored -5
Does this make it easier to run a small business?
Increases labor costs for small businesses by raising salary thresholds for exempt employees or requiring overtime pay.
- Scored -3
Does this leave more decisions to the states?
Imposes a federal standard that may supersede more lenient state-level salary thresholds.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Minimum Earnings for Exempt Workers: The bill establishes specific, rising salary thresholds for employees to qualify as exempt from overtime. This means employees would need to earn at least $45,000 initially, increasing to $55,000 in 2027, $65,000 in 2028, and $75,000 in 2029 to remain exempt. (Section 2(a)(1)(A)(i-v))
-
Automatic Inflation/Earnings Adjustments: Starting in 2030, the salary threshold will be updated annually based on the 55th percentile of weekly earnings of full-time salaried workers nationally. This ensures the threshold keeps pace with national earnings data. (Section 2(a)(1)(A)(v) and Section 2(a)(1)(C)(i))
-
Transparency of Earnings Data: The Bureau of Labor Statistics is required to publish weekly earnings data for full-time salaried workers by census region on its public website every quarter. (Section 2(b))
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Increased Salary Requirements for Exemption: To be considered exempt from overtime compensation, employees must meet higher weekly rate requirements. (Section 2(a)(1)(A))
-
Changes to Duty Requirements: The bill amends requirements for what constitutes exempt duties, including striking certain language regarding activities and changing specific hour requirements. (Section 3)
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would middle-income households be better off under this? — Directly benefits salaried middle-class workers by raising the minimum pay required for exemption from overtime. Would people in middle age be better off under this? — Mid-career professionals may see an increase in base salary or the eligibility for overtime pay. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — Young professionals in administrative or professional roles are more likely to benefit from the increased salary threshold. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Potential for higher wages for those near the threshold who were previously misclassified as exempt. Would union members be better off under this? — Generally aligns with union goals of increasing wages and protecting overtime pay. Would business owners be better off under this? — Imposes higher payroll costs through either higher salaries or additional overtime payments.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — Increasing the salary threshold for overtime exemptions likely increases earnings for many lower-to-middle management workers.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — Requires the BLS to publish quarterly weekly earnings data for full-time salaried workers. Does this give the federal government more power? — Increases the federal government's authority over employer salary requirements for overtime exemptions. Does this leave more decisions to the states? — Imposes a federal standard that may supersede more lenient state-level salary thresholds.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this raise the lowest wage an employer may pay? — While not a minimum wage for all, it effectively raises the minimum salary required to be exempt from overtime pay. Does this make it easier to run a small business? — Increases labor costs for small businesses by raising salary thresholds for exempt employees or requiring overtime pay.
- 11/11/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/1/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/10/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/22/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/16/2026
- 5 Cosponsors added.
- 5/15/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
- 22 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Alma AdamsDemocrat · North Carolina
Yassamin AnsariDemocrat · Arizona
Suzanne BonamiciDemocrat · Oregon
Everton BlairDemocrat · Georgia
Judy ChuDemocrat · California
Troy CarterDemocrat · Louisiana
Greg CasarDemocrat · Texas
Rosa DeLauroDemocrat · Connecticut
Christopher DeluzioDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Debbie DingellDemocrat · Michigan
Dwight EvansDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Maxwell FrostDemocrat · Florida
Valerie FousheeDemocrat · North Carolina
Jesús GarcíaDemocrat · Illinois
Steven HorsfordDemocrat · Nevada
Jahana HayesDemocrat · Connecticut
Pramila JayapalDemocrat · Washington
Jonathan JacksonDemocrat · Illinois
Summer LeeDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Grace MengDemocrat · New York
Kevin MullinDemocrat · California
John MannionDemocrat · New York
Sarah McBrideDemocrat · Delaware
Dave MinDemocrat · California
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Ilhan OmarDemocrat · Minnesota
Jimmy PanettaDemocrat · California
Delia RamirezDemocrat · Illinois
Luz RivasDemocrat · California
Emily RandallDemocrat · Washington
Janice SchakowskyDemocrat · Illinois
Mary Gay ScanlonDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Lateefah SimonDemocrat · California
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan
Maxine WatersDemocrat · California