A Democratic bill with 3 Democratic cosponsors · See all 3 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The "Feed Our Kids Act of 2026" aims to amend existing laws to provide free breakfasts and lunches to all children enrolled in participating schools. It establishes national average payment rates for breakfasts and lunches, which are adjusted annually for inflation. The bill also includes provisions for additional payments to encourage the use of locally-sourced farm products. Furthermore, it prohibits schools from collecting unpaid meal debt or engaging in "breakfast/lunch shaming" practices. Finally, it mandates a reimbursement program to address existing delinquent meal debts.
Yes· 3 of 14
- Scored +8
Would children be better off under this?
The bill ensures all children have access to free nutritional breakfasts and lunches without the threat of debt shaming.
- Scored +8
Would students be better off under this?
Students gain guaranteed access to free meals and are protected from the social stigma of meal debt.
- Scored +7
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
The bill eliminates meal costs and debt collection for families, providing significant relief to low-income households.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Universal Access to Meals: The bill amends the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 and the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to provide free breakfasts and lunches to all children enrolled in participating schools (Section 101; Section 202).
-
Protection from Shaming: Schools and school food authorities are prohibited from physically segregating children for debt shaming or using tokens, tickets, or published lists to identify children participating in the program (Section 101; Section 202; Section 207).
-
Debt Relief for Schools and Families: Schools are prohibited from collecting debt owed for unpaid meal charges (Section 101; Section 202). Additionally, a program will be established to reimburse schools for existing delinquent meal debt (Section 211).
-
Support for Local Agriculture: School food authorities can receive additional payments if they serve meals made with locally-sourced farm products (Section 201).
-
Expanded Meal Availability: The bill updates the Summer Food Service Program and the Child and Adult Care Food Program to ensure all children are eligible to participate (Section 205; Section 206).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts or burdens are explicitly stated in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would children be better off under this? — The bill ensures all children have access to free nutritional breakfasts and lunches without the threat of debt shaming. Would students be better off under this? — Students gain guaranteed access to free meals and are protected from the social stigma of meal debt. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The bill eliminates meal costs and debt collection for families, providing significant relief to low-income households. Would farmers be better off under this? — The bill provides additional payments to schools that prioritize locally-sourced farm products. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — Families with children in school will benefit from the reduction in daily food expenses. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — The bill helps mitigate food insecurity which can affect various demographic groups including Hispanic communities. Would women be better off under this? — Reducing household food costs can alleviate financial pressures often managed within family budgets.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — The bill provides universal free breakfast and lunch to all children, directly reducing food insecurity for low-income families. Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — Universal free meals can help reduce nutrition-related disparities that often disproportionately affect minority communities.
- Education And Technology
- Does this put more money into public schools? — The bill increases federal reimbursement rates to schools to provide universal free breakfast and lunch.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this make it easier to run a small business? — The bill incentivizes the purchase of locally-sourced farm products, which can benefit small local producers. Is this likely to grow the economy? — The bill provides additional payments to schools that serve locally-sourced farm products, supporting local agriculture.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this invest in rural communities? — The bill encourages the use of locally-sourced farm products, which provides economic support to rural agricultural producers. Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? — By incentivizing local food sourcing, the bill may reduce the environmental footprint of food transportation.
- 5/29/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/11/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Brittany PettersenDemocrat · Colorado
Darren SotoDemocrat · Florida