A Republican bill with 5 Democratic cosponsors · See all 7 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
Yes· 3 of 22
- Scored +8
Does this make health care easier to get in general?
Significantly improves access to skilled nursing facilities for patients with primary immunodeficiency disease.
- Scored +7
Would people over 65 be better off under this?
Seniors with primary immunodeficiency benefit from improved access to specialized nursing care.
- Scored +7
Would people with disabilities be better off under this?
Directly benefits individuals with a chronic medical disability/disease.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
Potential Negative Impacts for People
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would people with disabilities be better off under this? — Directly benefits individuals with a chronic medical disability/disease. Would retired people be better off under this? — Retirees are the primary users of Medicare and will benefit from expanded nursing facility services. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — Seniors with primary immunodeficiency benefit from improved access to specialized nursing care. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Increases availability of Medicare-covered treatments, reducing out-of-pocket costs for low-income patients. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — Increases availability of Medicare-covered treatments, reducing out-of-pocket costs for middle-class patients. Would children be better off under this? — Children with primary immunodeficiency can now access these services in skilled nursing facilities. Would people in middle age be better off under this? — Middle-aged patients with primary immunodeficiency can now access these services in skilled nursing facilities. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — Young adults with primary immunodeficiency can now access these services in skilled nursing facilities. Would high-income households be better off under this? — Improves healthcare access, though the impact is less significant than for lower-income groups. Would Black Americans be better off under this? — Provides better health access to those in this group suffering from primary immunodeficiency. Would Asian Americans be better off under this? — Provides better health access to those in this group suffering from primary immunodeficiency. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — Provides better health access to those in this group suffering from primary immunodeficiency. Would LGBTQ people be better off under this? — Improves healthcare access for LGBTQ individuals with primary immunodeficiency. Would men be better off under this? — Improves healthcare access for men with primary immunodeficiency. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — Provides better health access to those in this group suffering from primary immunodeficiency. Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together? — Improves healthcare access for veterans with primary immunodeficiency. Would white Americans be better off under this? — Provides better health access to those in this group suffering from primary immunodeficiency. Would women be better off under this? — Improves healthcare access for women with primary immunodeficiency.
- Healthcare
- Does this make health care easier to get in general? — Significantly improves access to skilled nursing facilities for patients with primary immunodeficiency disease. Does this put more money into Medicare, the health coverage for people over 65? — Expanding covered services under Title XVIII of the Social Security Act effectively increases Medicare expenditure.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this expand the rights of people with disabilities? — Improves healthcare access for individuals with a specific chronic health condition. Does this strengthen Social Security? — Amends the Social Security Act to expand beneficial health services for a specific patient population.
- 10/5/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/28/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/27/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/7/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/27/2026
- Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
Donald DavisDemocrat · North Carolina
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey
Doris MatsuiDemocrat · California
Tim MooreRepublican · North Carolina
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Mark PocanDemocrat · Wisconsin
Jefferson Van DrewRepublican · New Jersey