Eric Crawford (R-AR)
To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to modify the definition of food.
A Republican bill with 9 Democratic cosponsors · See all 26 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill proposes an amendment to the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008. The primary goal is to modify the existing definition of food used for SNAP eligibility. Specifically, it seeks to add "hot rotisserie chicken" to the list of authorized items. This change would result in certain wording adjustments within the current law.
Yes· 3 of 11
- Scored +2
Would children be better off under this?
Providing more diverse food options like rotisserie chicken can assist in meeting nutritional needs for children on SNAP.
- Scored +2
Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this?
The inclusion of rotisserie chicken provides more food options for young adults participating in the SNAP program.
- Scored +2
Would people in middle age be better off under this?
The bill expands the variety of food items that middle-aged individuals on SNAP can purchase.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Expanded food options: By inserting "hot rotisserie chicken" into the definition of food, the bill would allow this item to be explicitly included among those authorized for SNAP benefits. (Section 1)
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts mentioned: The provided text does not contain any information regarding potential negative consequences or burdens.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would Black Americans be better off under this? — The expansion of SNAP food definitions benefits African American households disproportionately represented in the program. Would Asian Americans be better off under this? — The bill provides more food options for Asian American households utilizing SNAP benefits. Would children be better off under this? — Providing more diverse food options like rotisserie chicken can assist in meeting nutritional needs for children on SNAP. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — The bill increases food flexibility for Hispanic American households receiving food assistance. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The bill increases the variety of food options available to households on low incomes through SNAP. Would people in middle age be better off under this? — The bill expands the variety of food items that middle-aged individuals on SNAP can purchase. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — The bill expands the definition of eligible food for Native American households on SNAP. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — Seniors relying on SNAP benefits will have access to an additional food item: hot rotisserie chicken. Would white Americans be better off under this? — The bill increases food options for White American households participating in the SNAP program. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — The inclusion of rotisserie chicken provides more food options for young adults participating in the SNAP program.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — The bill expands the definition of eligible food items for SNAP recipients to include hot rotisserie chicken.
- 6/8/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/28/2026
- 5 Cosponsors added.
- 4/22/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/21/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
- 18 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
2 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Jim CostaDemocrat · California
Ben ClineRepublican · Virginia
Gabe EvansRepublican · Colorado
Shomari FiguresDemocrat · Alabama
Michael GuestRepublican · Mississippi
Carlos GimenezRepublican · Florida
Andy HarrisRepublican · Maryland
Jeff HurdRepublican · Colorado
Mark HarrisRepublican · North Carolina
Jennifer KiggansRepublican · Virginia
Barry MooreRepublican · Alabama
Blake MooreRepublican · Utah
Morgan McGarveyDemocrat · Kentucky
Nathaniel MoranRepublican · Texas
Riley MooreRepublican · West Virginia
Kristen McDonald RivetDemocrat · Michigan
Sarah McBrideDemocrat · Delaware
Gary PalmerRepublican · Alabama
Terri SewellDemocrat · Alabama
Emilia SykesDemocrat · Ohio
Eric SorensenDemocrat · Illinois
Derrick Van OrdenRepublican · Wisconsin
Gabe VasquezDemocrat · New Mexico
Steve WomackRepublican · Arkansas
Bruce WestermanRepublican · Arkansas
Tony WiedRepublican · Wisconsin