A Republican bill with 1 Democratic cosponsor · See all 22 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, titled the "Trump Accounts for All Generations Act," seeks to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Its primary purpose is to make the Trump accounts contribution pilot program permanent. The legislation also introduces an inflation adjustment for the $1,000 amount mentioned in the code for taxable years beginning after 2028. Additionally, the bill makes several conforming amendments to remove the word "pilot" from various sections of the code. These changes are intended to apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2026.
Yes· 3 of 14
- Scored +4
Would middle-income households be better off under this?
Directly benefits middle-class families by making the $1,000 contribution limit permanent and inflation-adjusted.
- Scored +3
Would children be better off under this?
Makes savings accounts permanent, which can be used for generational wealth transfer for children.
- Scored +3
Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this?
Allows young adults to utilize permanent tax-advantaged accounts for long-term savings.
The opposite
- Scored -1
Does this reduce what the federal government owes?
Making a tax-advantaged contribution program permanent may slightly reduce federal tax revenue.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Permanent Program Access: Section 2(a) removes the expiration date of January 1, 2029, which makes the program a permanent fixture rather than a temporary pilot.
-
Inflation Protection: Section 2(b) implements an inflation adjustment for the $1,000 amount for taxable years beginning after 2028. This increase is based on a cost-of-living adjustment to ensure the amount remains relevant over time.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No Negative Impacts Identified: The provided text does not contain any provisions that describe negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would middle-income households be better off under this? — Directly benefits middle-class families by making the $1,000 contribution limit permanent and inflation-adjusted. Would children be better off under this? — Makes savings accounts permanent, which can be used for generational wealth transfer for children. Would high-income households be better off under this? — Provides another tax-advantaged vehicle for wealth accumulation. Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this? — Offers permanent tax-advantaged savings options. Would people in middle age be better off under this? — Provides permanent ability to contribute to these accounts for retirement or family planning. Would retired people be better off under this? — Ensures the permanence of accounts and maintains their value against inflation. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — Permanency of the program ensures stability for those nearing or in retirement. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — Allows young adults to utilize permanent tax-advantaged accounts for long-term savings. Would students be better off under this? — Provides a permanent savings vehicle that can potentially be used for future education. Would the very wealthiest people be better off under this? — Adds a small, permanent tax-advantaged tool to their portfolio. Would billionaires be better off under this? — Minor benefit due to the capped contribution amount. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Provides a mechanism for savings, though accessibility depends on available disposable income.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this cut taxes for middle-income families? — The bill makes a contribution program permanent and adjusts for inflation, potentially providing tax-advantaged savings benefits. Is this likely to grow the economy? — Encourages long-term savings and investment through a permanent account structure. Does this reduce what the federal government owes? — Making a tax-advantaged contribution program permanent may slightly reduce federal tax revenue.
- 10/26/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/10/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/30/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/24/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 6/2/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 5/19/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/14/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 5/12/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 4/28/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/15/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Randy FeenstraRepublican · Iowa
Vince FongRepublican · California
Clay FullerRepublican · Georgia
Adelita GrijalvaDemocrat · Arizona
Ashley HinsonRepublican · Iowa
Erin HouchinRepublican · Indiana
Abraham HamadehRepublican · Arizona
Brian JackRepublican · Georgia
Mike KellyRepublican · Pennsylvania
David KustoffRepublican · Tennessee
Nancy MaceRepublican · South Carolina
Daniel MeuserRepublican · Pennsylvania
Carol MillerRepublican · West Virginia
Blake MooreRepublican · Utah
Mariannette Miller-MeeksRepublican · Iowa
Richard McCormickRepublican · Georgia
Nathaniel MoranRepublican · Texas
Mark MessmerRepublican · Indiana
Tim MooreRepublican · North Carolina
Zachary NunnRepublican · Iowa
Daniel WebsterRepublican · Florida
Rudy YakymRepublican · Indiana