A Republican bill with 1 Democratic cosponsor · See all 4 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, titled the Improving Medicare Services Act of 2026, directs the Comptroller General of the United States to perform a specific study. The study focuses on the 1-800-MEDICARE service. The Comptroller General must complete this study and submit a report to Congress within one year of the act's enactment. The requested report includes several specific analyses regarding the service.
Yes· 3 of 5
- Scored +3
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The bill requires a report to Congress detailing service satisfaction, staffing, and contractor performance to increase oversight.
- Scored +2
Would people over 65 be better off under this?
The study aims to improve the 1-800-MEDICARE service which is a primary contact point for seniors.
- Scored +2
Would retired people be better off under this?
Improving the efficiency and staffing of the Medicare helpline directly benefits retired individuals.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Improved Service Oversight: The bill requires an analysis of customer wait times, overall satisfaction, staffing competency, staffing levels, and contractor performance under Section 2, subsections (1), (2), and (3). This information could help identify where the service is failing or succeeding.
-
Accountability for Service Changes: Under Section 2, subsection (4), the report must describe any improvements or downgrades in service areas previously studied. This ensures that any decline in service quality is documented.
-
Actionable Improvements: Section 2, subsections (5) and (6) require recommendations for improvement and a description of actions taken in response to previous recommendations. This creates a mechanism to ensure that the Secretary of Health and Human Services or contractors are acting on known issues to better serve the public.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly mentioned in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would retired people be better off under this? — Improving the efficiency and staffing of the Medicare helpline directly benefits retired individuals. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — The study aims to improve the 1-800-MEDICARE service which is a primary contact point for seniors.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill requires a report to Congress detailing service satisfaction, staffing, and contractor performance to increase oversight.
- Healthcare
- Does this make health care easier to get in general? — By analyzing wait times and staffing levels for 1-800-MEDICARE, the bill seeks to improve the quality of information access for beneficiaries. Does this put more money into Medicare, the health coverage for people over 65? — The bill mandates a study to identify improvements for the Medicare service line, which could lead to better resource allocation.
- 5/7/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/9/2026
- Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Tom BarrettRepublican · Michigan
J. CorreaDemocrat · California
Andrew GarbarinoRepublican · New York
Blake MooreRepublican · Utah