Ron Estes (R-KS)
Ensuring Better Interest Treatment and Deductibility Act (EBITDA)
A Republican bill with 23 Republican cosponsors · See all 23 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is titled the ``Ensuring Better Interest Treatment and Deductibility Act (EBITDA)''. It proposes an amendment to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Specifically, the bill aims to repeal a previous modification regarding the definition of adjusted taxable income. This change would affect the limitation on business interest. The adjustments are intended to modify section 163(j)(8)(A) of the code. These amendments would apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025.
Yes· 3 of 4
- Scored +3
Does this raise the taxes companies pay?
The bill limits the deduction of business interest by repealing a specific modification, which effectively increases the tax burden on businesses.
- Scored +1
Does this reduce what the federal government owes?
By increasing business tax liabilities through interest deduction limits, the bill may slightly increase federal revenue.
- Scored +1
Does this make the government pay for what it commits to?
The bill could enhance fiscal position by increasing tax collections from business interest limitations.
The opposite· 3 of 5
- Scored -4
Would business owners be better off under this?
The bill negatively impacts business owners by reducing the deductibility of interest.
- Scored -3
Does this cut taxes for small businesses?
The repeal of the modification likely increases the effective tax rate for businesses by limiting interest deductibility.
- Scored -3
Does this make it easier to run a small business?
The reduction in interest deductibility may place a heavier financial burden on businesses.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- There are no specific benefits or positive outcomes for individuals or groups explicitly described in the provided text.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- There are no specific negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups explicitly described in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — The bill negatively impacts business owners by reducing the deductibility of interest. Would farmers be better off under this? — The bill may negatively affect agricultural businesses that rely heavily on interest deductions.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this raise the taxes companies pay? — The bill limits the deduction of business interest by repealing a specific modification, which effectively increases the tax burden on businesses. Does this make the government pay for what it commits to? — The bill could enhance fiscal position by increasing tax collections from business interest limitations. Does this reduce what the federal government owes? — By increasing business tax liabilities through interest deduction limits, the bill may slightly increase federal revenue. Does this make it easier to run a small business? — The reduction in interest deductibility may place a heavier financial burden on businesses. Does this cut taxes for small businesses? — The repeal of the modification likely increases the effective tax rate for businesses by limiting interest deductibility. Is this likely to grow the economy? — Higher taxes and restricted interest deductions can potentially reduce capital investment and economic growth.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill adjusts tax code definitions, which is a function of federal authority over taxation.
- 9/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/1/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/13/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/27/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/23/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/9/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/8/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/13/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/9/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/26/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- 12 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Jodey ArringtonRepublican · Texas
Vern BuchananRepublican · Florida
Aaron BeanRepublican · Florida
Mike CareyRepublican · Ohio
Randy FeenstraRepublican · Iowa
Michelle FischbachRepublican · Minnesota
Kevin HernRepublican · Oklahoma
David KustoffRepublican · Tennessee
Darin LaHoodRepublican · Illinois
John MoolenaarRepublican · Michigan
Carol MillerRepublican · West Virginia
Gregory MurphyRepublican · North Carolina
Blake MooreRepublican · Utah
Max MillerRepublican · Ohio
Nathaniel MoranRepublican · Texas
Tim MooreRepublican · North Carolina
August PflugerRepublican · Texas
Pete SessionsRepublican · Texas
Adrian SmithRepublican · Nebraska
Keith SelfRepublican · Texas
Claudia TenneyRepublican · New York
Beth Van DuyneRepublican · Texas
Rudy YakymRepublican · Indiana