A Democratic bill with 37 Democratic cosponsors · See all 37 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign Agriculture.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "SNAP Benefits Fairness Act of 2025," seeks to amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008. The primary goal is to repeal the current limitation on the maximum deduction for shelter expenses. This deduction is used when determining benefit amounts. If passed, the changes would take effect on the first January 1st following the bill's enactment.
Yes· 3 of 21
- Scored +6
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
The bill increases the potential benefit amount for low-income households with significant shelter expenses.
- Scored +5
Would people in cities be better off under this?
Urban residents often face higher shelter costs which this bill helps address through the deduction.
- Scored +5
Would retired people be better off under this?
The bill provides significant benefit increases for low-income retirees with high shelter costs.
The opposite
- Scored -2
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?
Increasing SNAP benefit amounts through higher deductions may lead to increased government spending.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Removal of Shelter Expense Limits: By striking subparagraph (B) of Section 5(e)(6) of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008, the bill repeals the cap on how much a person can deduct for shelter costs. This could benefit individuals by allowing their actual shelter expenses to be considered when determining their benefits. (Section 2)
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly stated in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The bill increases the potential benefit amount for low-income households with significant shelter expenses. Would retired people be better off under this? — The bill provides significant benefit increases for low-income retirees with high shelter costs. Would people in cities be better off under this? — Urban residents often face higher shelter costs which this bill helps address through the deduction. Would people with disabilities be better off under this? — The bill provides more significant support for disabled individuals who may have higher fixed costs. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — The repeal of the deduction cap directly assists seniors on fixed incomes with high shelter costs. Would Black Americans be better off under this? — Statistically, the bill may provide significant benefits to African American households disproportionately represented in SNAP programs. Would children be better off under this? — Increased SNAP benefits can provide more food security for children in low-income households. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — Statistically, the bill may provide significant benefits to Hispanic American households disproportionately represented in SNAP programs. Would men be better off under this? — Increased food security can benefit men in low-income households. Would people in middle age be better off under this? — Increased SNAP benefits can provide more food security for middle-aged adults in low-income households. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — Statistically, the bill may provide significant benefits to Native American households disproportionately represented in SNAP programs. Would students be better off under this? — Low-income students can receive higher benefit amounts for food security. Would women be better off under this? — Increased food security can benefit women in low-income households. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — Increased SNAP benefits can provide more food security for young adults in low-income households. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — The bill provides benefit increases for low-income rural residents regardless of cost of living. Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together? — Veterans meeting low-income SNAP criteria will see increased benefits. Would Asian Americans be better off under this? — The bill provides assistance to any low-income household meeting the criteria. Would white Americans be better off under this? — The bill provides assistance to any low-income household meeting the criteria.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — By allowing higher shelter expense deductions, SNAP benefits may increase for low-income individuals, helping reduce poverty. Is this likely to reduce homelessness? — Increased food assistance may provide greater stability for those facing housing insecurity.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this reduce what the federal government spends? — Increasing SNAP benefit amounts through higher deductions may lead to increased government spending.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill involves federal amendments to the Food and Nutrition Act, slightly centralizing authority over benefit determination.
- 11/10/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/2/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 7/30/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/22/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/9/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/10/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 8/8/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/23/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/22/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/21/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/16/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/24/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/9/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 6/6/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/5/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/4/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/8/2025
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 5/7/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 5/5/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/28/2025
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign Agriculture.
- 2/6/2025
- Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H510-511)
- 1/28/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
Yassamin AnsariDemocrat · Arizona
Joyce BeattyDemocrat · Ohio
Nanette BarragánDemocrat · California
Shontel BrownDemocrat · Ohio
Wesley BellDemocrat · Missouri
Judy ChuDemocrat · California
Troy CarterDemocrat · Louisiana
Sheila Cherfilus-McCormickDemocrat · Florida
Greg CasarDemocrat · Texas
Adriano EspaillatDemocrat · New York
Maxwell FrostDemocrat · Florida
Valerie FousheeDemocrat · North Carolina
Shomari FiguresDemocrat · Alabama
Adelita GrijalvaDemocrat · Arizona
William KeatingDemocrat · Massachusetts
Sydney Kamlager-DoveDemocrat · California
Stephen LynchDemocrat · Massachusetts
Summer LeeDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Kweisi MfumeDemocrat · Maryland
Grace MengDemocrat · New York
Seth MoultonDemocrat · Massachusetts
Kevin MullinDemocrat · California
Jennifer McClellanDemocrat · Virginia
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Stacey PlaskettDemocrat · Virgin Islands
Emily RandallDemocrat · Washington
Adam SmithDemocrat · Washington
Terri SewellDemocrat · Alabama
Lateefah SimonDemocrat · California
Bennie ThompsonDemocrat · Mississippi
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Jill TokudaDemocrat · Hawaii
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan
Nikema WilliamsDemocrat · Georgia
Frederica WilsonDemocrat · Florida
Bonnie Watson ColemanDemocrat · New Jersey
George WhitesidesDemocrat · California