CONGRESS FOR VOTERS

Thomas Massie (R-KY)

No Immunity for Glyphosate Act

H.R. 7601 · House bill Health

A Republican bill with 12 Democratic cosponsors · See all 16 cosponsors

Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

In committee

Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.

The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.

Its path through Congress

  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

What this bill would do

This bill, titled the "No Immunity for Glyphosate Act," aims to stop the use of Federal funds for the implementation of a specific Executive order regarding elemental phosphorus and glyphosate-based herbicides. It prohibits Federal funds from being used to administer or enforce the Executive order issued on February 18, 2026 (Section 2). Additionally, the act allows individuals or their representatives to bring civil actions against entities that manufacture, distribute, or sell these substances if they suffer physical injury, illness, disease, or death (Section 3a). It defines covered entities as those involved in the manufacturing, distribution, formulation, supply, or sale of these substances (Section s 3b). The bill removes legal immunity and specific defenses that entities might otherwise use under the Defense Production Act of 1950 (Section 3e and 3f).

Yes· 3 of 6

  • Scored +8

    Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?

    Increases accountability for manufacturers of glyphosate and phosphorus by removing legal immunities.

  • Scored +6

    Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?

    Removes immunity barriers, allowing individuals a cause of action in court for injuries.

  • Scored +4

    Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?

    Increases corporate liability for chemical exposure from herbicides and phosphorus.

The opposite

  • Scored -7

    Would business owners be better off under this?

    Creates significant legal and financial liability for manufacturers and distributors of specified chemicals.

  • Scored -3

    Would farmers be better off under this?

    Potential supply chain disruptions or costs associated with herbicide manufacturers facing lawsuits.

  • Scored -2

    Does this give the federal government more power?

    Restricts the executive branch's ability to implement a specific order using federal funds.