A Democratic bill with 56 Democratic cosponsors · See all 56 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, titled the "Drain ICE Act of 2026," aims to amend the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" (Public Law 119-21). The primary purpose is to remove funding for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). To achieve this, the bill repeals specific sections of the previous Act. Additionally, it calls for the rescission of all unobligated balances previously appropriated under those sections.
Yes· 3 of 9
- Scored +6
Would immigrants be better off under this?
The bill aims to protect the human rights and dignity of immigrants and reduce the detention of those without criminal records.
- Scored +5
Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this?
The bill seeks to prevent unlawful arrests and detentions of immigrants, a demographic that includes many Hispanic Americans.
- Scored +5
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?
The bill rescinds unobligated balances and repeals funding previously appropriated for ICE.
The opposite
- Scored -5
Does this tighten control of the border?
The bill reduces funding for ICE, which is a primary agency responsible for immigration enforcement and border security functions.
- Scored -3
Does this give the federal government more power?
The bill reduces the operational capacity of a major federal agency by rescinding its funding.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Protection of Constitutional and Human Rights: The bill's findings suggest that removing ICE funding relates to the responsibility to uphold constitutional protections, human rights, and fundamental dignity (Section 2, Finding 1).
-
Improvement of Detention Conditions: The text cites reports of cruel and inhumane conditions, as well as inadequate conditions in detention facilities, suggesting that changes to funding could address these issues (Section 2, Findings 3 and 4).
-
Protection of Vulnerable Populations: The bill notes concerns regarding insufficient safeguards for asylum seekers, refugees, families, and children (Section 2, Finding 4).
-
Prevention of Unlawful Detentions: The findings state that ICE has unlawfully arrested and detained U.S. citizens, green card holders, and other immigrants with legal status (Section 2, Finding 5).
-
Addressing Detention of Non-Criminal Individuals: The bill notes that nearly half of those in ICE custody as of November 2025 had no criminal charges, and detention of those without criminal records has risen significantly (Section 2, Findings 6 and 7).
-
Resource Redirection: The findings suggest that DHS has redirected resources away from counterterrorism, counternarcotics, and human-trafficking prevention toward immigration enforcement (Section 2, Finding 9).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Impact on Private Contractors and Operators: The bill's findings mention that the expansion of detention spending has created financial incentives for private contractors and detention facility operators (Section 2, Finding 8).
-
Loss of Appropriated Funds: The bill mandates the repeal of sections 90003 and 100052 of Public Law 119-21 and the rescission of all unobligated balances of amounts appropriated by those sections (Section 3 and Section 4).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would immigrants be better off under this? — The bill aims to protect the human rights and dignity of immigrants and reduce the detention of those without criminal records. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — The bill seeks to prevent unlawful arrests and detentions of immigrants, a demographic that includes many Hispanic Americans. Would children be better off under this? — The bill's findings indicate that the removal of ICE funding aims to protect children from insufficient safeguards in detention. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The bill aims to protect vulnerable populations, which often include low-income immigrants and families. Would people in cities be better off under this? — The bill's findings suggest that curbing immigration enforcement may address concerns regarding the redirection of resources from other critical missions.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this reduce what the federal government spends? — The bill rescinds unobligated balances and repeals funding previously appropriated for ICE.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill reduces the operational capacity of a major federal agency by rescinding its funding.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this put more money into stopping terrorism? — The bill's findings suggest that DHS has redirected resources away from counterterrorism to immigration enforcement, implying a redirection back to critical missions.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this make it easier for immigrants already here to become citizens? — The bill's findings suggest that removing ICE funding protects asylum seekers, refugees, and those with legal status from unlawful detention. Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — The bill's findings suggest that curbing detention practices may protect vulnerable families and children. Does this tighten control of the border? — The bill reduces funding for ICE, which is a primary agency responsible for immigration enforcement and border security functions.
- 8/31/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/22/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/23/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/25/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/19/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/5/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 3/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/25/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/11/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/9/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 2/4/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 37 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Suzanne BonamiciDemocrat · Oregon
Julia BrownleyDemocrat · California
Brendan BoyleDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Nanette BarragánDemocrat · California
Shontel BrownDemocrat · Ohio
Wesley BellDemocrat · Missouri
Yvette ClarkeDemocrat · New York
André CarsonDemocrat · Indiana
Judy ChuDemocrat · California
Jasmine CrockettDemocrat · Texas
Danny DavisDemocrat · Illinois
Diana DeGetteDemocrat · Colorado
Lloyd DoggettDemocrat · Texas
Lois FrankelDemocrat · Florida
Maxwell FrostDemocrat · Florida
Laura FriedmanDemocrat · California
John GaramendiDemocrat · California
Daniel GoldmanDemocrat · New York
Adelita GrijalvaDemocrat · Arizona
Steven HorsfordDemocrat · Nevada
Jahana HayesDemocrat · Connecticut
Val HoyleDemocrat · Oregon
Glenn IveyDemocrat · Maryland
Henry JohnsonDemocrat · Georgia
Sara JacobsDemocrat · California
Robin KellyDemocrat · Illinois
Raja KrishnamoorthiDemocrat · Illinois
Teresa Leger FernandezDemocrat · New Mexico
Zoe LofgrenDemocrat · California
Stephen LynchDemocrat · Massachusetts
Ted LieuDemocrat · California
George LatimerDemocrat · New York
Seth MoultonDemocrat · Massachusetts
Kevin MullinDemocrat · California
Robert MenendezDemocrat · New Jersey
Jennifer McClellanDemocrat · Virginia
April McClain DelaneyDemocrat · Maryland
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Frank PalloneDemocrat · New Jersey
Chellie PingreeDemocrat · Maine
Brittany PettersenDemocrat · Colorado
Mike QuigleyDemocrat · Illinois
Emily RandallDemocrat · Washington
Brad ShermanDemocrat · California
Janice SchakowskyDemocrat · Illinois
Darren SotoDemocrat · Florida
Mary Gay ScanlonDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Andrea SalinasDemocrat · Oregon
Lateefah SimonDemocrat · California
Paul TonkoDemocrat · New York
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Ritchie TorresDemocrat · New York
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan
Maxine WatersDemocrat · California
Nikema WilliamsDemocrat · Georgia
Bonnie Watson ColemanDemocrat · New Jersey